[CF-metadata] axis attribute
Dear Richard
> In this case, I suspect it would still work if the "x" and "y" indices
> are transposed, so as long as we can identify the two dimensions which
> are horizontal.
Right. I agree with that, in my alternative argument of today i.e. X and Y
are useful to identify the horizontal coords. If X and Y are attached to
1D coordinate variables, then any 2D auxiliary coordinate variable which
has those dimensions must be in the horizontal. That is a bit more work, but
it seems more natural to me that X and Y should belong with 1D axes.
> But there could be cases where the parity flip would
> matter, e.g. where axial quantities such as vorticity are involved. So I
> think it is useful to allow the axis = X and Y attribute for coordinate
> variables that are a continuous transformation from cartesian
> coordinates or lat/lon coordinates (without a parity inversion).
I would say that the standard name is the right way to identify lon and lat
specifically. Maybe we could have a convention that X-Y-up is a right-handed
coordinate system - what do you think?
Best wishes
Jonathan
Received on Wed Nov 22 2006 - 12:58:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:40 BST