Dear all,
My proposal for a new standard name "*sea_binary**_mask*" hasn't raised
much discussion. Is there a chance it could be included in the next
table update?
Regards,
Elodie
On 11/07/2017 09:55, Elodie Fernandez wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to suggest the addition of a new standard_name to
> describe land-sea masks. A standard_name already exists:
> land_binary_mask (
> X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0 elsewhere. 1 = land, 0
> = sea.). But in the ocean modelling community, we have already
> existing files describing those masks, but from an "ocean point of
> view", so 1 is for sea and 0 is for land points.
> So I would like to request the addition of the standard_name
> "*sea_binary**_mask*",
> with definition "X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0
> elsewhere. 1 = sea, 0 = land" and unit "1".
>
> Best regards,
> Elodie
>
> Click here
> <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/cuuFVDQY8CXGX2PQPOmvUkISMVDCv96oI0uMwjWeGArdW6mhGRxXYtOzoDUNY3q8PqmUFQIrCxnNfN+NdwfdFw==>
> to report this email as spam.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20170823/3141503a/attachment.html>
Received on Wed Aug 23 2017 - 03:07:59 BST
