Dear all,
My proposal from July 11th for a new standard name "*sea_binary**_mask*"
hasn't raised much discussion. Is there a chance it could be included in
the next table update?
Regards,
Elodie
On 23/08/2017 11:07, Elodie Fernandez wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> My proposal for a new standard name "*sea_binary**_mask*" hasn't
> raised much discussion. Is there a chance it could be included in the
> next table update?
>
> Regards,
> Elodie
>
> On 11/07/2017 09:55, Elodie Fernandez wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I would like to suggest the addition of a new standard_name to
>> describe land-sea masks. A standard_name already exists:
>> land_binary_mask (
>> X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0 elsewhere. 1 = land,
>> 0 = sea.). But in the ocean modelling community, we have already
>> existing files describing those masks, but from an "ocean point of
>> view", so 1 is for sea and 0 is for land points.
>> So I would like to request the addition of the standard_name
>> "*sea_binary**_mask*",
>> with definition "X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0
>> elsewhere. 1 = sea, 0 = land" and unit "1".
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Elodie
>>
>> Click here <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/MZbqvYs5QwJvpeaetUwhCQ==>
>> to report this email as spam.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CF-metadata mailing list
>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20180315/cb9ffc73/attachment.html>
Received on Thu Mar 15 2018 - 08:35:40 GMT
