Hi Alison,
Just to clarify that I am in total agreement with this and had a bit of a senior moment in a previous message.
Cheers, Roy.
________________________________
From: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate [ajay.krishnan at noaa.gov]
Sent: 26 February 2015 14:56
To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization
Hi Alison,
Yes, please use mol kg-1 as the canonical unit.
Thanks,
Ajay
alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk<
http://stfc.ac.uk> alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk <mailto:cf-metadata%40cgd.ucar.edu?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BCF-metadata%5D%20Request%20for%20new%0A%09standard-name%3A%09apparent_oxygen_utilization&In-Reply-To=%3C014539AC4976BE4490A360410A8C20178A2D6062%40EXCHMBX01.fed.cclrc.ac.uk%3E>
Thu Feb 26 03:56:32 MST 2015
Dear All,
Thank you for the constructive discussion of this proposal - it seems that agreement has been reached on apparent_oxygen_utilisation with canonical units of mol kg-1. (Just to double check: is this the correct unit for use with the World Ocean Database, which I believe is the reason for requesting the name in the first place. Units of mol m-3 have also been mentioned in this discussion, but this could be a misunderstanding.
Best wishes,
Alison
________________________________
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20150226/72a18fab/attachment-0001.html>
Received on Thu Feb 26 2015 - 08:28:50 GMT
