⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow

From: Signell, Richard <rsignell>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:20:23 -0400

Richard,

I think moving to github would be a huge improvement. The git model
and the tools that github provides would make it much easier for other
folks to propose changes, and for those changes to be reviewed,
discussed and merged. I think Brian and a few others were also in
favor when we discussed this last fall, but we lacked someone to carry
the flag.

-Rich

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Hattersley, Richard
<richard.hattersley at metoffice.gov.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently been dipping into the UGRID conventions
> (https://github.com/ugrid-conventions/ugrid-conventions) and was struck by
> how pleasant the editing/publishing workflow was. Clearly from a content
> complexity point of view the UGRID conventions are smaller and simpler than
> CF so a direct comparison is not possible, but to help illustrate some of
> the possibilities I've prepared a cut-down demo version of the CF
> conventions document using GitHub and "Read the Docs".
>
> The published versions of the demo are available from:
> http://cf-conventions.readthedocs.org. I've set the default version to 1.6,
> but by using the options in the bottom-left corner of the page it is
> possible to view 1.7-draft.1 instead. There is also a PDF option, but that
> currently has a few quirks which I've not attempted to address. NB. By
> ticking a box in GitHub, these published versions are automatically updated
> whenever the underlying content changes.
>
> The underlying "source code" is defined using reStructuredText (reST) markup
> for processing by the Spinx document generator. It is hosted on GitHub at:
> https://github.com/cf-metadata/cf-conventions. I created the reST markup
> using an off-the-shelf HTML-to-reST converter but it did require some
> subsequent manual tweaks.
>
> I've also created a simple "pull request" to illustrate what happens when
> someone proposes a change:
> https://github.com/cf-metadata/cf-conventions/pull/1. NB. By default GitHub
> shows the changes in the source code, but it can also show a rendered
> version of the changes, much like the strikeout/highlight style used in the
> current workflow:
> https://github.com/cf-metadata/cf-conventions/pull/show/1/files/e7c8459#diff-e7c84590262562a10e9fb4cf714098d3
>
> Is there interest in taking this further?
>
>
> Richard Hattersley
> Benevolent Dictator of Iris - a CF library for Python:
> www.scitools.org.uk/iris
> Met Office FitzRoy Road Exeter Devon EX1 3PB United Kingdom
> Tel: +44 (0)1392 885702
> Email: richard.hattersley at metoffice.gov.uk Web: www.metoffice.gov.uk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>



-- 
Dr. Richard P. Signell   (508) 457-2229
USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd.
Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
Received on Mon Mar 10 2014 - 08:20:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST

⇐ ⇒