⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] Request for a new standard_name: barometric_altitude

From: Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:14:58 +0100

Dear John and Martin

I see that "barometric altitude" is a term which is in use, so I accept that
it's OK for a standard name. I thought it worthwhile to ask the question.

Best wishes and thanks

Jonathan

On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 08:43:10AM -0700, John Graybeal wrote:
> Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 08:43:10 -0700
> From: John Graybeal <john.graybeal at marinexplore.com>
> To: CF Metadata List <cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for a new standard_name:
> barometric_altitude
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
>
> Sorry my response was offline, an accident; will append below for the record.
>
> I support Martin's rationale for sticking with the original; it will also be more recognizable to many. This may be a good spot for using aliases, one direction or the other, as it seems "barometric altitude" is functionally exactly the same meaning as "air pressure expressed as altitude".
>
> Previously commented offline:
>
> > I may be having a silly moment, can you explain how the second definition matches the second name? I would have assumed altitude_above_ground means how far the airplane is above the terrain -- in this case based on a barometric pressure altitude, and some knowledge of how high the ground is in a given location.
> >
> > Instead the definition seems to be more like barometric_altitude_based_on_takeoff_pressure.
>
> John
>
>
> On Jul 6, 2013, at 05:25, "Schultz, Martin" <m.schultz at fz-juelich.de> wrote:
>
> > Dear Jonathan (and John who replied offline),
> >
> > "* Would it be acceptable and useful to follow some other kinds of standard name and call this air_pressure_expressed_as_altitude?"
> >
> > Actually, I think not. The goal of this quantity is really to describe altitude, not pressure. This is different from a "mole_fraction..._expressed_as...", because there it is really the same thing with a simple conversion factor. So, I would still prefer "barometric_altitude".
> >
> > Concerning the second name, I see that we need to define this better. Actually, it doesn't seem as straightforward as I thought... We will take your comments into account when rephrasing the proposal for the second name.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > From: Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>
> > To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> > Subject: [CF-metadata] Request for a new standard_name:
> > barometric_altitude
> > Message-ID: <20130705165717.GA32174 at met.reading.ac.uk>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > Dear Martin
> >
> > Obviously these quantities are useful. I have two suggestions for your
> > consideration, hoping I have understood the idea.
> >
> > * Would it be acceptable and useful to follow some other kinds of standard name
> > and call this air_pressure_expressed_as_altitude?
> >
> > * above_ground doesn't seem specific enough to me, because you don't mean the
> > local ground, which we would usually call "surface" in standard names (i.e. the
> > bottom of the atmosphere). To be more precise, we could use something longer
> > such as wrt_surface_at_flight_origin. It refers to a particular time and place.
> >
> > Best wishes
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
> > 52425 Juelich
> > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
> > Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
> > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher
> > Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender),
> > Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
> > Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Das Forschungszentrum oeffnet seine Tueren am Sonntag, 29. September, von 10:00 bis 17:00 Uhr: http://www.tagderneugier.de
> > _______________________________________________
> > CF-metadata mailing list
> > CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
> ------------------------------------
> John Graybeal
> Senior Data Manager, Metadata and Semantics
>
> T +1 (408) 675-5545
> F +1 (408) 616-1626
> skype: graybealski
>
> Marinexplore
> 920 Stewart Drive
> Sunnyvale, CA
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
Received on Mon Jul 08 2013 - 13:14:58 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST

⇐ ⇒