[CF-metadata] Reverse-time trajectory

From: Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:33:35 +0100

Dear Richard

> It's not my intention to call for a new coordinate variant. I'm just
> trying to reconcile the description of time series given in 9.1:
> "a series ... with monotonically increasing times"
> with the prose in H.2.1.
>
> What does 9.1 actually mean by "monotonically increasing" if the data
> can be stored in non-monotonic order?

Ah yes, good point! Perhaps we should delete "with monotonically increasing
times" in Table 9.1, and also "ordered" in the trajectoryProfile definition.

Best wishes

Jonathan
Received on Tue May 15 2012 - 13:33:35 BST