HI all,
following my previous email. I think the rules for discussed in ticket
85 should apply only to discrete sampling geometries.
Karl
On 4/2/12 1:00 PM, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Thanks for your postings. There seems to be a consensus on this. I have
> therefore changed my existing trac ticket 85 accordingly
> https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/85
> to record this consensus. Note that this means we have to amend section 9.6
> as well, which explicitly disallowed missing data in aux coord vars (except
> for nonexistent elements). We have to change this, or else it would not be
> legal for Nan to store her profiles with missing pressure in discrete sampling
> geometries following sect 9, for instance.
>
> I hope I've got this right. Ticket 85 is a defect ticket, intended to correct
> mistakes uncontroversially! Therefore if anyone isn't happy with this, they
> should object on the ticket, and we'll need to open a different one to discuss
> another way to modify the convention.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20120402/ce4a0556/attachment.html>
Received on Mon Apr 02 2012 - 16:03:36 BST
