Hi All,
I've added the unit "bit" to the appropriate xml file, so the CF Checker
on PUMA will no longer flag it as an invalid unit.
Regards,
Ros.
On 03/10/11 07:54, Culverwell, Ian wrote:
> Thanks Steve; understood.
>
> Ian.
>
>
> --------Original Message-----
> From: cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu
> [mailto:cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Emmerson
> Sent: 30 September 2011 15:54
> To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Is the "bits" unit CF-compliant?
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ian,
>
> On 09/30/2011 01:00 AM, Culverwell, Ian wrote:
>> Does
>>
>> <singular>bit</singular>
>>
>> mean that "bits" (plural) is not a valid unit?
> The unit "bits" is automatically created and added from the unit "bit"
> if the entry doesn't have a<plural> tag, which is used for things like
> "foot" and "feet".
>
> - --Steve
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk6F2BMACgkQqos4yNz3KBHhWgCdEu5ude9sTxNFl3AKArtfaj3K
> MV8AnjAGfs8PnILG/D75EuAYFVj479pI
> =PjYj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
Rosalyn Hatcher
NCAS Computational Modelling Services
Dept. of Meteorology, University of Reading,
Earley Gate, Reading. RG6 6BB
Email: r.s.hatcher at reading.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 118 378 6016
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20111003/c2efd062/attachment-0001.html>
Received on Mon Oct 03 2011 - 01:40:01 BST
