[CF-metadata] Is the "bits" unit CF-compliant?

From: Culverwell, Ian <ian.culverwell>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 07:54:46 +0100

 Thanks Steve; understood.

Ian.


--------Original Message-----
From: cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu
[mailto:cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Emmerson
Sent: 30 September 2011 15:54
To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Is the "bits" unit CF-compliant?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ian,

On 09/30/2011 01:00 AM, Culverwell, Ian wrote:
> Does
>
> <singular>bit</singular>
>
> mean that "bits" (plural) is not a valid unit?

The unit "bits" is automatically created and added from the unit "bit"
if the entry doesn't have a <plural> tag, which is used for things like
"foot" and "feet".

- --Steve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk6F2BMACgkQqos4yNz3KBHhWgCdEu5ude9sTxNFl3AKArtfaj3K
MV8AnjAGfs8PnILG/D75EuAYFVj479pI
=PjYj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
Received on Mon Oct 03 2011 - 00:54:46 BST