⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] Is the "bits" unit CF-compliant?

From: Steve Emmerson <steve>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:54:11 -0600

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ian,

On 09/30/2011 01:00 AM, Culverwell, Ian wrote:
> Does
>
> <singular>bit</singular>
>
> mean that "bits" (plural) is not a valid unit?

The unit "bits" is automatically created and added from the unit "bit"
if the entry doesn't have a <plural> tag, which is used for things
like "foot" and "feet".

- --Steve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk6F2BMACgkQqos4yNz3KBHhWgCdEu5ude9sTxNFl3AKArtfaj3K
MV8AnjAGfs8PnILG/D75EuAYFVj479pI
=PjYj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Fri Sep 30 2011 - 08:54:11 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST

⇐ ⇒