Fine for me!
Cheers
Pierre
On 17/09/2010 13:20, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear Alison and Pierre
>
> I have one late comment on these C-cycle names, about this one:
>
>
>> 1) products_of_land_use_change_carbon_content
>>
> From the discussion I understand what it means and it is well-defined. However
> as an English phrase I found it opaque. Although not quite systematic, would
> it be OK to turn it round, making it
> carbon_content_of_products_of_land_use_change
> There are other instances where we have alternative syntaxes X_Y and Y_of_X,
> depending on how long X is! The difficulty with understanding the above phrase
> is that it is unclear how much of it "products_of" applies to.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: P_Friedlingstein.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 397 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20100917/9c4dbc2a/attachment-0002.vcf>
Received on Fri Sep 17 2010 - 06:59:50 BST
