Hi Andrea:
To figure out if you are using the right form, its best to send CDL to
this group.
To debug your use of the netcdf-java library, its best to send code,
error messages and a sample file to netcdf-java at unidata.ucar.edu.
Regards,
John
andrea antonello wrote:
> Dear Jonathan,
> thanks for your reply.
>
>
>> I don't know whether the problem is lack of memory. That would depend on
>> the software you are using, rather than on netCDF or the CF convention, so
>> I'm not sure what to suggest really. You could try creating an empty file
>> of the right size by writing it in CDL and using ncgen, to test that it
>> can be done. Sorry not to be more helpful.
>>
>
> At the moment I have no problem with the memory overload really. I
> just would like to understand if I am implementing the proposed CF way
> properly.
> Can you confirm me that in the above example with 2 stations of
> interest for the temperature variable (from 100) I am right in
> creating a variable with timeSize*100 instead of
> timeSize*2, which brings an 80% of 0.0 values of overload? Where
> overload here really means never used. And if yes, should those unused
> values stay 0.0 or be somehow flagged?
> I would love to do this the CF way and I am just wondering if someone
> stumbled into this doubt also.
>
> Best regards,
> Andrea
>
>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
Received on Tue Jan 19 2010 - 07:48:19 GMT
