⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] CF standard names for echam5-hammoz (tendencies)

From: Christiane Textor <christiane.textor>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:14:44 +0100

Dear Heinke,

Please find below my comments on the tendendies, including the response
from Jonathan (email 18/11).

>
> _due_to_gravitational_settling (old _due_to_sedimentation)
> ******************
> Jonathan proposed:
> _due_to_gravitational_settling
>
> We agree.

Sounds good, but I did not get this email from Jonathan, has it been
sent to the list?

>
> _due_turbulent_deposition
> ***************************************
ok

> _due_to_dry_deposition
> **********************
> tendency_of_atmosphere_content_of_aerosol_particle_number_due_to_dry_deposition
you have defined atmosphere_number_content_of_aerosol_particle
so I would expect here
tendency_of_atmosphere_number_content_of_aerosol_particle_due_to_dry_deposition
(and would suggest to use the plural -> particles)

> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_dry_aerosol_expressed_as_sulfur_due_to_dry_deposition
>
tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_expressed_as_sulfur_dry_aerosol_due_to_dry_deposition


>
> _due_to_emission
> ****************
> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_primary_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_emission
ok

>
> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_dry_aerosol_sulfur_expressed_as_sulfur_due_to_emission
there is a discussion on the composition of the sulfur emissions, that
can be different in different models. I would suggest to add in the
comment, that the user must specify the specific composition he/she is
referring to.

> _due_to_gravitational_settling

> *********************************************************
> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_black_carbon_dry_aerosol_due_to_gravitational_settling
ok

> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_dust_dry_aerosol_due_to_gravitational_settling
ok

> tendency_of_atmosphere_content_of_aerosol_particle_number_due_to_gravitational_settling
tendency_of_atmosphere_number_content_of_aerosol_particle_due_to_gravitational_settling
see above for dry_dep, use plural?

> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_gravitational_settling
ok

> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_dry_aerosol_expressed_as_sulfur_due_to_gravitational_settling

tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_expressed_as_sulfur_dry_aerosol_due_to_gravitational_settling

> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_seasalt_dry_aerosol_due_to_gravitational_settling
ok
>
>
>
> _due_to_wet_deposition
> **********************
> tendency_of_atmosphere_content_of_aerosol_particle_number_due_to_wet_deposition
tendency_of_atmosphere_number_content_of_aerosol_particle_due_to_wet_deposition
see above, use plural?

> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_dry_aerosol_expressed_as_sulfur_due_to_wet_deposition
tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_expressed_as_sulfur_dry_aerosol_due_to_wet_deposition
>
> Christiane why do you think 'sulfur' is better. You probably have good
> reasons for this?
I do not know anymore, I guess I was wrong, sorry.
>

>
> _due_to_turbulent_deposition
> ***************************************
> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_black_carbon_dry_aerosol_due_to_turbulent_deposition
ok
> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_dust_dry_aerosol_due_to_turbulent_deposition
ok
> tendency_of_atmosphere_content_of_aerosol_particle_number_due_turbulent_deposition
tendency_of_atmosphere_number_content_of_aerosol_particle_due_turbulent_deposition
see above, use plural?

> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_turbulent_deposition
ok

> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_dry_aerosol_expressed_as_sulfur_due_to_turbulent_deposition
tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_expressed_as_sulfur_dry_aerosol_due_to_turbulent_deposition

> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_seasalt_dry_aerosol_due_to_turbulent_deposition
ok

Best regards,
Christiane
Received on Sun Nov 23 2008 - 10:14:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:40 BST

⇐ ⇒