[CF-metadata] physically equivalent units

From: Roy Lowry <rkl>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:47:37 +0000

Hello Jonathan,

I would support Phil's suggestion. I have been asked to clarify this before.

Cheers, Roy.

>>> Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk> 11/22/08 8:57 AM >>>
Dear Phil

> Do you think it would it be useful to
> add a short footnote to this effect to section 3.3, or is the use of the
> phrase "physically equivalent (not necessarily identical)" in that
> section self-evident?

I don't know, really - I wonder what others think?

Best wishes

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

-- 
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.

Received on Sat Nov 22 2008 - 07:47:37 GMT