[CF-metadata] physically equivalent units

From: John Graybeal <graybeal>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:15:50 -0700

Ditto. There will be many who can't parse the shorter form. And since
often there is confusion about the role of canonical units vis-a-vis
standard names, anything that clarifies or augments that information
will be helpful.

John


On Nov 22, 2008, at 7:47 AM, Roy Lowry wrote:

> Hello Jonathan,
>
> I would support Phil's suggestion. I have been asked to clarify
> this before.
>
> Cheers, Roy.
>
>>>> Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk> 11/22/08 8:57 AM >>>
> Dear Phil
>
>> Do you think it would it be useful to
>> add a short footnote to this effect to section 3.3, or is the use
>> of the
>> phrase "physically equivalent (not necessarily identical)" in that
>> section self-evident?
>
> I don't know, really - I wonder what others think?
>
Received on Sat Nov 22 2008 - 15:15:50 GMT