From: Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:57:05 +0000
Dear Phil
> Do you think it would it be useful to
> add a short footnote to this effect to section 3.3, or is the use of the
> phrase "physically equivalent (not necessarily identical)" in that
> section self-evident?
I don't know, really - I wonder what others think?
Best wishes
Jonathan
Received on Sat Nov 22 2008 - 01:57:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:40 BST
