⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] statistic indices

From: Pamment, JA <J.A.Pamment>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:59:48 +0100

Dear Jonathan,

Yes, these proposals certainly provide a lot of food for thought - thank
you for your time. Heinke has told me that she will discuss my comments
with her colleagues and I am sure that there will be a need for quite a
bit more discussion on the mailing list before we can finalise these
names.

Best wishes,
Alison

>
> Gosh, these are complicated. I agree with the general idea of your
replies
> that
> we should use general mechanisms wherever possible, rather an
introducing
> a
> multitude of specific names for indices of various types. We should in
> particular use coordinates to specify thresholds and ranges. I still
> haven't
> had time to reply in detail, though. I will try to do so this week, as
> next
> week I will be on holiday. J

------
Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre Fax: +44 1235 446314
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Email: J.A.Pamment at rl.ac.uk
Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
Received on Wed May 02 2007 - 04:59:48 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:40 BST

⇐ ⇒