Hi Curtis:
http://www.climatemodeling.org/bgcmip/common_fields.html
seems to be about standard name conventions. I can't tell easily from your web site if:
1. the output format is netCDF?
2. you are using CF conventions for coordinate systems?
Curtis Covey wrote:
> Dear CF Metadata Discussion Group,
>
> The CCSM Biogeochemistry Working Group
> (www.ccsm.ucar.edu/working_groups/Biogeo) invites your comments on the
> conventions we've developed for the new Carbon-LAnd Model
> intercomparison Project (C-LAMP). To see these conventions, go to the
> C-LAMP Web site at climate.ornl.gov/bgcmip, then click on the link
> "Developing a Common Set of Output Fields for the CCSM C-LAMP."
>
> Note that C-LAMP presently involves just two or three versions of a
> single model (the CCSM). As Pierre Friedlingstein has remarked, for some
> purposes it might be considered a pilot project for the next phase of
> the larger Coupled Climate and Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison
> Project (C4MIP). Accordingly, we do not intend to wait for a formal
> endorsement by the CF group before releasing C-LAMP output to the
> Working Group.
>
> At the same time, we welcome your suggestions on how the C-LAMP data
> conventions could be improved. I have copied this message to other
> interested parties who may not belong to the CF Metadata Discussion
> Group. Please forward to others I've missed.
>
> We looking forward to hearing from you.
>
> - Curt Covey for the CCSM BGC Working Group
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
Received on Mon Apr 30 2007 - 13:13:20 BST
