[CF-metadata] Parameter Ontology Project

From: Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:50:05 +0100

Dear Lex

Quite so. The standard name table should and does accommodate the need for
various definitions of quantities, alternative, generic and specific. We need
to have names for the concepts people actually want to use. If different groups
use different concepts, that's fine so long as the definitions are clear.

Cheers

Jonathan
Received on Fri Sep 22 2006 - 01:50:05 BST