⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] PMIP (including 1 or more that originated in C4MIP) Standard Names: Carbon and Nitrogen terms

From: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC <alison.pamment>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 13:27:41 +0000

Dear Jonathan,

Well spotted! I think they should all say 'mass_content'. So we should have
nitrogen_mass_content_of_forestry_and_agricultural_products (kg m-2) for nProduct
soil_mass_content_of_nitrogen (kg m-2) for nSoil.

I will update them in the standard names editor. They will still be published in the May update.

In the last update I made some aliases for carbon content names and I've just realised I missed one:
vegetation_carbon_content -> vegetation_mass_content_of_carbon (kg m-2).
I'll add this one into the May update.

Best wishes,
Alison
------
Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archival Email: alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.

-----Original Message-----
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 04 May 2018 13:39
To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] PMIP (including 1 or more that originated in C4MIP) Standard Names: Carbon and Nitrogen terms

Dear Alison

Yes, I agree with Martin's 13C and 14C names, which I queried. I also agree with you about nitrogen_compounds_expressed_as_nitrogen.

Reading through this list, I compared these:

> litter_mass_content_of_nitrogen (kg m-2)
> nitrogen_content_of_forestry_and_agricultural_products (kg m-2)
> (kg m-2) vegetation_mass_content_of_nitrogen (kg
> m-2)

Why do two of them have mass_content and two just content?

Best wishes

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
Received on Fri May 04 2018 - 07:27:41 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:42 BST

⇐ ⇒