On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:22 AM, V Balaji - NOAA Affiliate <
v.balaji at noaa.gov> wrote:
> The relevant section of the UGRID conventions
> <https://ugrid-conventions.github.io/ugrid-conventions/#2d-flexible-mesh-mixed-triangles-quadrilaterals-etc-topology> seems
> consistent with this (except _FillValue is suggested).
>
Thank you! -- I have been reading this thread and wondering what's going
on. "simple geometries" can indeed represent this kind of grid, but that's
not what it's intended for, and it's not a great way to do it. Nor is
(it's a major pet peeve of mine that the geopatial data statndards are
require you to tweak a grid as a bunch of unorganized polygons....)
And cell bounds aren't really for this purpose either.
Maybe I am missing the OP's use case, but an unstructured mesh should be
represented by the UGRID standard -- that's what it's for. Does it not work
for the OP's case somehow?
-CHB
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20170910/89f2150c/attachment.html>
Received on Sun Sep 10 2017 - 16:30:05 BST