Hi Alison,
That's great. No problem regarding the delay - making all our datasets fully CF compliant is still a work in progress!
Thanks,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk [mailto:alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: 02 March 2016 17:40
To: Hollis, Dan; cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] New standard name: number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold
Dear Dan,
My apologies for not having published this long ago - I think it was a simple oversight. The name was indeed agreed in the original discussion and I have now marked it as "Accepted" in my editor, which means it will automatically be added into version 31 of the standard name table.
Best wishes,
Alison
------
Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Email: alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Campus, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hollis, Dan [mailto:dan.hollis at metoffice.gov.uk]
> Sent: 26 February 2016 10:34
> To: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP); cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] New standard name:
> number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold
>
> Hi Alison,
>
> As far as I can tell there have been no objections to my proposal.
> Would it be possible to add it to the standard name table please?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk [mailto:alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk]
> Sent: 03 September 2014 13:07
> To: Hollis, Dan; Gregory, Jonathan; cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] New standard name:
> number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold
>
> Dear Dan,
>
> Thanks for your standard name proposal - you have done all that is
> necessary for it to be 'picked up'. I am the person responsible for
> updating the standard name table (the latest version can be viewed on
> the CF website at
> http://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-standard-names/27/build/cf-
> standard-name-table.html). I also maintain a list of proposals that
> are in the pipeline, so to speak, which is linked from the website
> 'Discussions' page
> (http://cfconventions.org/discussion.html) or can be viewed directly
> at
> http://cfeditor.ceda.ac.uk/proposals/1?status=active&namefilter=&propo
> s erfilter=&descfilter=&filter+and+display=filter. Your proposal has
> been added to this list. (N.B. I am also in the process of adding
> other recent proposals to bring the list up to date as it hasn't been
> done for a while).
>
> I agree with Jonathan that your proposal for
> number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold is fine and
> since it is so similar to an existing name I think that unless anyone
> raises any objections within the next week it can be accepted for
> publication in the standard name table.
>
> Best wishes,
> Alison
>
> ------
> Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
> NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre Email: alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk
> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
> R25, 2.22
> Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hollis, Dan [mailto:dan.hollis at metoffice.gov.uk]
> > Sent: 03 September 2014 11:20
> > To: Gregory, Jonathan; cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New standard name:
> > number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold
> >
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > Thanks for your support for the proposed standard name.
> >
> > I'm new to this process. I appreciate more time needs to be given to
> > allow others to comment but I was wondering if there is anything
> > else I need to do i.e. assuming there are no objections raised via
> > the mailing list will the Standard Names Committee pick this up
> > automatically and add it to the next release?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu] On
> Behalf
> > Of Jonathan Gregory
> > Sent: 01 September 2014 17:36
> > To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> > Subject: [CF-metadata] New standard name:
> > number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold
> >
> > Dear Dan
> >
> > > number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold
> > >
> > > The definition would be similar to that for the existing standard
> > > name
> > 'number_of_days_with_air_temperature_below_threshold', the only
> > difference being that it would relate to surface temperature rather
> > than air temperature. We require this to allow us to store values of
> > the number of days of ground frost i.e. the number of days when the
> > grass minimum temperature (= surface temperature) dropped below 0
> > degC. Following the approach for air temperature, the threshold
> > would be specified via a coordinate variable called 'surface_temperature'.
> >
> > That seems fine to me. Thanks for your efforts to convert to CF.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Jonathan
> > _______________________________________________
> > CF-metadata mailing list
> > CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> > _______________________________________________
> > CF-metadata mailing list
> > CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> --
> Scanned by iCritical.
Received on Thu Mar 03 2016 - 02:40:41 GMT
