On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Jim Biard <jbiard at cicsnc.org> wrote:
> The point I'm trying to make about gregorian_nls is that it lacks any
> mechanism for specifying which time system is being used for the timestamp
> in the reference date & time.
>
and that, indeed is the only thing we need the calendar specification for,
yes? (after that, seconds are well defined).
> or we state that the timestamp in the reference must be UTC. Declaring
> the reference timestamp unambiguously as UTC doesn't force anyone to
> extract absolute times from the time variable in UTC. It does require data
> consumers to convert the UTC timestamp to GPS or TAI or whatever before
> proceeding to extract absolute times from the time variable.
>
Isn't TAI also complete? Or am I all confused?
-CHB
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20150521/3f1a46e8/attachment-0001.html>
Received on Thu May 21 2015 - 16:37:28 BST