Dear all,
I agree with this view.
Karl
On 5/5/15 9:52 AM, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I agree with the view that we shouldn't be more restrictive about which year
> should be chosen for supplying climatological time coords. It is an arbitrary
> choice (in fact the coord is always arbitrary when the value applies to the
> entire cell, such as for a mean or a sum). The aim should be to be helpful to
> the data-users, who will probably use the coord for plotting the data. My
> preference is for the first year, since it's easiest to know which one that is!
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20150505/eef3d51e/attachment.html>
Received on Tue May 05 2015 - 12:44:11 BST
