⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] percent coverage by GOES-R geophysical variables

From: rhorne at excaliburlabs.com <rhorne>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:35:33 -0400

Dear Jonathan:

  

Thanks for the reply..

  

The specific geophysical quantity where this issue came up are the
different cloud phase categories (std name = cloud_phase_category). that
are reported for the entire image on a percentage basis. Note that we have
not yet proposed standard names for the specific cloud phase categories,
and are exploring other data design options.

  

Moving forward we will propose "percent_" standard_names as required.

  

very respectfully,

  

randy

----------------------------------------
 From: "Jonathan Gregory" <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 1:28 PM
To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] percent coverage by GOES-R geophysical variables

Dear Randy

You added the following to ticket 102. It's a reasonable point, but I
don't
think it belongs in that ticket. I suggest we discuss it on the email
list.

> On GOES-R ground, some of the data we report for a given geographic
region
> (i.e. a cell containing many observations) is the percent that a
> particular geophysical quantity exists.
>
> We were planning on using the cell method "sum" because it generally
> conforms to the definiiton of sum in Appendix E (The data values are
> representative of a sum or accumulation over the cell. This is the
default
> method for a quantity that is extensive with respect to the specified
> dimension.)
>
> The problem with doing this is ...
>
> Percent is not the same units of the geophysical quantity. To solve
this,
> the units column for the "sum" row in appendix E could be modified to
> allow percent.
>
> Another option may be to treat "percent" as a cell method.

I would say that the percent existence of X is a different geophysical
quantity
from X and therefore needs its own standard name, which will be
dimensionless
as you say (not in the units of X). This is like area_fraction quantities
e.g.
cloud_area_fraction or area_fraction_below_surface. Could you give some
examples of X? The appropriate cell_method for the derived variable is
"sum",
as you suggest, since it represents the entire cell, not a point.

Best wishes

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20130613/ee59be5c/attachment.html>
Received on Thu Jun 13 2013 - 12:35:33 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST

⇐ ⇒