Works for me. And although I don't need it for CAPE, I like Jonathan W's
suggestion of final_air_pressure_of_lifted_parcel for the upper limit.
(I was originally thinking it would be preferable to have the physical quantity
(air pressure) at the beginning, but looking at the Guidelines for Construction
of CF Standard Names, I see that the [surface] and [component] elements come
first, and I think the original/final modifier is more like one of those
elements than it is like one of the elements that comes after the physical
quantity.)
Cheers,
--Seth
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 08:52:01 +0100
Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk> wrote:
>Dear Jonathan W, Seth
>
>I think
>> air_pressure_of_lifted_parcel_at_source
>is fine. Seth wondered if _at_start_of_lifting would make it even clearer.
>I'm inclined to think that isn't necessary ... but it made me think of yet
>another possibility for your consideration, namely
> original_air_pressure_of_lifted_parcel
>What do you think? That avoids the confusion of "origin", I think, while
>still using that word, which I think Seth suggested (originally).
>
>> ambient_air_pressure_of_lifted_parcel
>is no longer needed, Seth indicates.
>
>Cheers
>
>Jonathan
>_______________________________________________
>CF-metadata mailing list
>CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
Received on Wed Jun 05 2013 - 11:22:52 BST
