Hi Christian,
These names look fine (I think there's a missing underscore in the
first) so we would have:
upward_sensible_heat_flux_in_air; W m-2
upward_latent_heat_flux_in_air; W m-2.
The syntax is consistent with many existing names and we already have
surface fluxes for the same quantities. I assume that these are 3-D
quantities and you would use a vertical coordinate variable to specify
the vertical location of the flux.
These names are accepted for inclusion in the standard name table. I
have already committed the changes for today's update, however, another
update will take place one month from now and it will include these
names.
Best wishes,
Alison
------
Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre Email:
alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu [mailto:cf-metadata-
> > bounces at cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of christian.wetzel
> > Sent: 22 March 2012 12:15
> > To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> > Subject: [CF-metadata] upward_sensible_heatflux_in_air,
> > upward_latent_heat_flux_in_air
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > as proposed earlier, I would like to have the following names added
> to
> > the standard name table:
> >
> > upward_sensible_heatflux_in_air
> > upward_latent_heat_flux_in_air
> >
> > See http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-
> metadata/2011/027518.html
> > for reference.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Christian
> > _______________________________________________
> > CF-metadata mailing list
> > CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
Scanned by iCritical.
Received on Thu Mar 22 2012 - 07:20:55 GMT
