⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] Convention attribute

From: Dave Allured <dave.allured>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 22:23:41 -0700

I will be glad to open a trac ticket. Let me have a day or so draft
some amendment wording. My intention is to use Unidata's
recommendations in the NetCDF Users Guide as a starting point, and
include notes about conformance and avoiding conflicts.

--Dave

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Jonathan Gregory
<j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk> wrote:
> Dear all - such as Roy, John (Graybeal) and Mark (Hedley)
>
> Would someone have time to open a trac ticket to propose a change to the CF
> convention, in order to clarify the Conventions attribute, following all this
> useful email discussion? It seems to me that it would be good to make a
> definite decision. I think it's been recognised that, whatever the syntax, it
> is up to the data-writer to ensure that multiple conventions do not conflict,
> so we ought to state this as well as defining the permissible syntax.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
Received on Tue Jan 03 2012 - 22:23:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST

⇐ ⇒