⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] new TEOS-10 standard names

From: Lowry, Roy K. <rkl>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:31:13 +0000

Hi John,

I have a concern with your exclusion of the surface from the term sea_water_temperature. What Standard Name would you use for the temperature data stream in a CTD profile that extends from the surface to depth? I'm more comfortable with the idea of keeping sea_water_temperature vague so it can include a mixture of surface and within water body measurements, but making the SST terms explicitly exclude temperatures within the water body.

Cheers, Roy.
________________________________________
From: cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu [cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of John Graybeal [jbgraybeal at mindspring.com]
Sent: 26 November 2011 03:59
To: Alison Pamment
Cc: CF Metadata List
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] new TEOS-10 standard names

Alison,

You do impressive work.

On Nov 25, 2011, at 12:03, <alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk> <alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk> wrote:

> (b) sea_water_temperature
> There is agreement to retain the standard name sea_water_temperature as this is useful particularly for observations. It currently has no explanatory text. In response to the discussion I propose to add the following sentence: 'Sea temperature is the in situ (bulk) temperature of the sea water, not the surface or skin temperature.'

In the proposed definition, do you mean to say 'Sea water temperature is ...' ?

Regarding the existing salinity quantities, the straightforward conclusion (though not implementation) is to make parallel changes to those quantities, and add parallel quantities at least for sea_water_practical_salinity, on the assumption that the users of the original quantities would need the replacement and practical is a likely replacement (I'm guessing here).

However, to a degree this violates the 'wait for demand' principal of CF. A solution might be to put out the question, for each original quantity together with each new salinity (practical, absolute, preformed) "Do you need this value, and if so, would you suggest a correction to the definition?" Those with the needs could check the appropriate boxes, and you could backfill any others that are needed later.

John




John Graybeal <mailto:jgraybeal at ucsd.edu>
phone: 858-534-2162
Product Manager
Ocean Observatories Initiative Cyberinfrastructure Project: http://ci.oceanobservatories.org
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata--
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
Received on Sat Nov 26 2011 - 02:31:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST

⇐ ⇒