⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] Is there a convention defining day offsets to use for monthly average time series?

From: Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:33:32 +0100

Dear Karl

I agree with Karl about this:

> I'm not sure why we should assume anything if the bounds are
> missing. Making an assumption would be valuable if the absence of
> bounds invariably implied a rule (e.g., centers half-way between
> bounds), but otherwise the assumption could be wrong, so what have
> we gained?
...
> It might especially be difficult to decide where to place the bounds
> in the case of unevenly spaced grid-points.

While I agree we should not assume a default for missing bounds, I think it
would be good to recommend that bounds should be included. At present we do
not do this. If we made it a recommendation (in section 5.1), the CF_checker
would give a warning if there were no bounds.

Cheers

Jonathan
Received on Fri Aug 12 2011 - 00:33:32 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST

⇐ ⇒