Hi Upendra,
I am leaving for Vienna for the EGU general assembly meeting. I will
send you the present specification the week after the next.
Best regards,
Stefano
> Hi Upendra,
>
> As part of the effort to establish CF as an OGC standard, Stefano
> Nativi has created a UML diagram and carefully crafted systematic
> description of the CF extension to the netCDF classic data model.
> I'll send Stefano a copy of this message so he can send you the
> latest version of the appropriate information. I have copies that I
> can send, but I fear they may be out of date.
>
> Please note that Stefano is very busy at this time as the chair of the
> ESSI division of the EGU which is meeting next week, so he may not be
> able to respond immediately.
>
> -- Ben
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Upendra Dadi <Upendra.Dadi at noaa.gov
> <mailto:Upendra.Dadi at noaa.gov>> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
> I am trying to better understand CF model and its relationship
> with netCDF-classic data model. Is there even a relationship? If I
> am creating a netCDF file using CF conventions, does the file have
> to be using classic data model? If I am using netCDF4 with strings
> and no other feature of netCDF4, could it still be CF compliant.
> Is it right to say that one of the basic elements of CF standard
> is regular arrays as opposed to variable length arrays? And that
> is where the "relationship" between CF model and netCDF-classic
> data model ends? Does CF "recognize" variable length arrays?
> I guess these issues are important in the context of proposed
> discrete sampling geometry extension to CF.
>
> Upendra
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu <mailto:CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
>
Received on Sat Apr 02 2011 - 02:48:06 BST
