-- +1(217)265-7710 http://hdfeos.org On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Karl Taylor <taylor13 at llnl.gov> wrote: > Hi, > > This file looks CF-compliant to me. I don't think it has to be 2-d. Like > John Caron, I am mildly curious what the 3-dimensions represent. > > regards, > Karl > > On 05-Mar-10 12:30 PM, H. Joe Lee wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a satellite data that stores lat / lon information in 3-D >> array and I'm wondering how such data can meet the CF convention. >> >> Following the >> http://*cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/documents/cf-conventions/1.4/ch05s02.html >> page example convention, here's the description of my data: >> >> ------------------------- >> dimensions: >> >> d0 = 447 ; >> d1 = 3 ; >> d2 = 360; >> lev = 18 ; >> >> variables: >> float V(lev,d0,d1,d2) ; >> T:long_name = "Precipitable Water" ; >> T:units = "cm" ; >> T:coordinates = "lon lat" ; >> float lev(lev) ; >> lev:long_name = "pressure level" ; >> lev:units = "hPa" ; >> float lon(d0,d1,d2) ; >> lon:long_name = "longitude" ; >> lon:units = "degrees_east" ; >> float lat(d0,d1,d2) ; >> lat:long_name = "latitude" ; >> lat:units = "degrees_north" ; >> ----------------------------------------------- >> >> My question is, should lat / lon coordinate variables be always 2-D >> array in CF-convention for two dimensional coordinate system? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> +1(217)265-7710 >> http://*hdfeos.org >> _______________________________________________ >> CF-metadata mailing list >> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu >> http://*mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata >> >> >> > >Received on Mon Mar 08 2010 - 07:37:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST