Dear Jonathan,
Thank you for pointing out these anomalies. I agree that we should
standardise the syntax where possible. I'll create two new aliases in
the next update of the table.
I'll look forward to reading your work on standard name construction.
Best wishes,
Alison
------
Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre Fax: +44 1235 446314
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Email: alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk
Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu [mailto:cf-metadata-
> bounces at cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gregory
> Sent: 23 February 2010 08:11
> To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: [CF-metadata] two anomalous standard names
>
> Dear Alison
>
> I suggest that these two standard names should be amended:
> moles_per_unit_mass_of_cfc11_in_sea_water ->
> moles_of_cfc11_per_unit_mass_in_sea_water
> The latter order is followed by all the other names i.e.
> moles_of_X_per_unit_mass_in_sea_water
>
> change_over_time_in_atmospheric_water_content_due_to_advection ->
> change_over_time_in_atmosphere_water_content_due_to_advection
> since this is the only standard name containing the word
"atmospheric",
> and
> in other standard names we have phrases
> atmosphere[_...]_water_content
>
> I noticed these exceptions because I've been working on a method of
> inferring
> the "lexicon" from which the standard names are constructed. I hope to
> post
> some information about this soon.
>
> Cheers
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
Scanned by iCritical.
Received on Tue Mar 02 2010 - 04:02:58 GMT