[CF-metadata] Proposal for additional CF biogeochemistry attributes

From: Philip Cameronsmith <cameronsmith1>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:42:06 -0700 (PDT)

Hi All,

To help bring this to a conclusion, let me reiterate and say that
mole_ratio_of_X_to_Y_in_medium is acceptable to me.

Best wishes,

      Philip

On Thu, 14 May 2009, Bruce Hackett wrote:

> Dear all,
> I don't have vote here, but if you're going for a new prefix, then "mole_ratio_" sounds better
> to me.
> Cheers, Bruce
>
> Jonathan Gregory wrote:
>
> Dear Philip
>
> I would be happy with
>
>
> mole_ratio_of_X_to_Y_in_medium
>
>
> i.e. the same as what I suggested, without "mixing". I think that mole_ratio
> is better than mole_fraction. I don't think it sounds right to say "fraction
> of X to Y"; don't we normally say "ratio of X to Y"?
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bruce Hackett Senior Scientist
> Norwegian Meteorological Institute (met.no), R & D Div.
> P.O. Box 43 - Blindern e-mail: Bruce.Hackett at met.no
> N-0313 Oslo Phone: +47 22 96 33 39
> NORWAY Fax: +47 22 96 33 80
> Mob: +47 48 048 958
> URL: http:// met.no/english/r_and_d_activities/people/bruceh.html
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Philip Cameron-Smith Atmospheric, Earth, and Energy Division
pjc at llnl.gov Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
+1 925 4236634 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA94550, USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu May 14 2009 - 11:42:06 BST