Dear All,
I think the way CF use is developing in the observational community means we certainly need raw measurement standard names.
Cheers, Roy.
>>> Heinke Hoeck <heinke.hoeck at zmaw.de> 3/12/2009 11:07 am >>>
Dear all,
I agree with Jonathan,
I would propose a short suffix like '_raw'.
Are the units free selectable for the '_raw' data? Should we add 'raw_unit'?
I think the raw data are a proxy. This should be commented in the header.
Best wishes
Heinke
Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I too would vote for including specific standard names for raw measurements.
> We have already added some standard names which relate to the measurement and
> thing measured rather than to geophysical quantities, and it seems the logical
> route to me.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
Received on Thu Mar 12 2009 - 07:23:45 GMT
