[CF-metadata] standard names for chemistry - MCM

From: Philip J. Cameronsmith1 <cameronsmith1>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:26:48 -0700 (PDT)

On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Jonathan Gregory wrote:

> Dear Philip
>
>> Another option is for CF to allow all possible units for each specie:
>> But this may lead to undesirable proliferation of names.
> On the whole, it seems better to support various possibilities if people want
> to use them. It is not really the role of CF to advocate the use of certain
> quantities rather than others; in order to encourage many users to adopt CF
> and to promote interoperability, we generally support many options but try to
> ensure they are all clearly defined. Hence both
>> moles_of_X
>> mass_of_X
> are possible. By
>> carbons_of_X
> do you mean the idea we have written as expressed_as_X e.g. nitrogen or
> carbon in some standard names?

Hi Jonathan,

Yes, that is the concept I was referring to. Thank you for clarifying
it. :-)

Best wishes,

    Philip




------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Philip Cameron-Smith Atmospheric, Earth, and Energy Division
pjc at llnl.gov Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
+1 925 4236634 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA94550, USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wed Oct 22 2008 - 16:26:48 BST