[CF-metadata] Missing standardnames for our our ocean model MPI-OM

From: Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:09:59 +0100

Dear Martina

> Maybe, it would be clearer to use "due_to_wind_mixing" instead
> of "due_to_wind".

Yes, personally I think due_to_wind_mixing would be more informative. Thanks
for the suggestion.

> 4. energy tendencies
> tendency_of_potential_energy_content_of_ocean_layer_due_to_diffusion; W m-2
> tendency_of_potential_energy_content_of_ocean_layer_due_to_convection; W m-2

I think these are fine, and also consistent with existing names containing
"potential energy".

> Regarding the "where_sea" parameters, we wait for the decision of ticket 17?

I would suggest so, yes. I hope that decision will be soon!

Best wishes

Jonathan
Received on Tue Jun 24 2008 - 15:09:59 BST