Hi Jon
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 15:39 +0100, Jon Blower wrote:
> Also, what if someone wants to express a new anomaly that isn't in the
> standard name table? If the anomaly is expressed in the standard name
> then they have to go through a procedure to standardize the name
> before they can use it "legally". I bet a lot of people won't bother
> to do this. If there were a more generic way of expressing anomalies
> then they could use this immediately.
>
Our thoughts entirely. The temptation to skip round the standard names
issue and simply use long_names is, er, sorely tempting ;-)
Phil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20080403/08a0f3b4/attachment-0002.html>
Received on Thu Apr 03 2008 - 09:11:06 BST
