[CF-metadata] standard name proposal for CCMVal

From: Martin Juckes <m.n.juckes>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:02:02 +0000

It doesn't diagnose ozone loss, it is used to diagnose ozone loss. It is also
used for other purposes.

What is wrong with using passive to mean not active?

Martin

On Friday 07 March 2008 09:30, you wrote:
> Dear Martin (not via list)
>
> > it ozone in the sense that it is initialised from the model ozone fields.
> I see.
> How does it diagnose chemical loss? Is it destroyed like real ozone? If it
> is just advected and diffused and there are no sources following
initialisation
> it must end up spread out uniformly, I suppose.
>
> I'm sure we can devise a name which isn't too long but which say what this
> quantity is.
>
> Cheers
>
> Jonathan
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 07 2008 - 04:02:02 GMT