[CF-metadata] Possible Glitch In CF-1.0 Compliance Checker Tool

From: Rosalyn Hatcher <r.s.hatcher>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:02:24 +0100

Hi Sue,

Yes, I'll look into this. Could you send me your netcdf file as an
example please?
The output from "ncdump -c" will be enough.

Thanks,
Ros.

Sue Dettling wrote:
> The CF compliance checker complains at having attributes
> flag_meanings AND valid_min and valid_max.
> However, you can have a valid_range for flag values( see cf conventions
> doc section 3.5). Would it be possible for the compliance checker to accept
> valid_min and valid_max along with other flag attributes?
>
> Thanks,
> Sue
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rosalyn Hatcher
NCAS Computational Modelling Support
Dept. of Meteorology, University of Reading, 
Earley Gate, Reading. RG6 6BB
Email: r.s.hatcher at reading.ac.uk     Tel: +44 (0) 118 378 6016

Received on Fri Aug 17 2007 - 04:02:24 BST