[CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name: area_fraction
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Steven Emmerson <
emmerson
>
Date
: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:27:35 -0700
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:36 AM Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC <
martin.juckes at stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
> Could we avoid this confusion in the future by replacing the term with a
> more neutral term, such as "area_cover"?
>
That would be inconsistent with the NIST recommendation. See <
https://www.nist.gov/physical-measurement-laboratory/nist-guide-si-chapter-8
>.
Search for "fraction".
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20190130/db39f176/attachment.html
>
Received on
Wed Jan 30 2019 - 10:27:35 GMT
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC: "[CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name: area_fraction"
Previous message
:
Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC: "[CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name: area_fraction"
In reply to
:
Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC: "[CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name: area_fraction"
Next in thread
:
Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC: "[CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name: area_fraction"
Reply
:
Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC: "[CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name: area_fraction"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:43 BST