⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] Two [simple] questions

From: Bärring Lars <Lars.Barring>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:13:10 +0000

Dear all,

Two simple questions of understanding:

1. If I have (observed) daily precipitation with unit mm/day and want to store this in a CF compliant file, should I use standard name
--- "lwe_thickness_of_precipitation_amount" with canonical unit metre and the "per day" part is inferred from the time bounds, or
--- "lwe_precipitation_rate" having canonical unit "m s-1",
--- if both are acceptable, is one to be preferred?


2. The long_name is free, but should be descriptive. I am thinking of this as a succinct plot title, so the question is what practical limitation there might be in relation to different software. Is it advisable to use ASCII spaces (from
Github issue #141 indicates that only standard ASCII character set should be used) ?


Many thanks,

Lars

--
Lars B?rring
FDr, Forskare
PhD, Research Scientist
SMHI  /  Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Rossby Centre
SE - 601 76 NORRK?PING
http://www.smhi.se<http://www.smhi.se/>
E-post / Email: lars.barring at smhi.se<mailto:lars.barring at smhi.se>
Tel / Phone: +46 (0)11 495 8604
Fax: +46 (0)11 495 8001
Bes?ksadress / Visiting address: Folkborgsv?gen 17
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20190124/d82a6102/attachment-0001.html>
Received on Thu Jan 24 2019 - 07:13:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:43 BST

⇐ ⇒