I still think this is ugly, but can't think of a better way of doing it.
I agree ... :-)
Bryan
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 09:33, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear All
>
> > I see what you mean about the possibly ambiguity of "change" applying to
> > other coordinates than time. I can't think of a single word which would
> > do the job, but we could use the phrase change_over_time_in. Would that
> > be all right and not too cumbersome, do you think?
>
> No-one's commented on this. Do we agree on it? It would mean standard names
> of change_over_time_in_surface_snow_amount for Elke and
> change_over_time_in_ atmospheric_water_content_due_to_advection for
> Burkhardt. Silence is assumed to mean agreement!
>
> Cheers
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
Bryan Lawrence
Director of Environmental Archival and Associated Research
Head of the NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre
CCLRC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Phone +44 1235 445012; Fax ... 5848; Web: home.badc.rl.ac.uk/lawrence
Received on Thu Apr 06 2006 - 09:16:40 BST
