[CF-metadata] CF convention for vector quantities

From: John Caron <caron>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:54:41 -0700

Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear Bert et al.
>
> I read Bert's original proposal carelessly - sorry. It was to introduce extra
> dummy variables to point to components, rather than to take the component info
> out of the standard names of the components.
>
> I remain unconvinced about introducing this kind of information into the file,
> as it cannot be depended upon if it is optional, so it doesn't help simplify
> programs, and it is redundant because it can be deduced on the fly (I think).
> However I know I have a general preference for clever programs and stupid
> (though complete, correct and clear) files.

Hi Jonathan:

I appreciate your advocacy of that POV throughout the years, its very important that we maintain CF files to be as simple amd clear as possible. I also observe the tension between data providers and consumers, and it seems likely we will always be looking for the right balance between program writers and file writers.

Regards,
John
Received on Mon Mar 20 2006 - 14:54:41 GMT