[CF-metadata] Need for a new vertical coordinate definition: "Ocean generalized sigma coordinate"
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 09:18:22AM -0500, Rich Signell wrote:
> ...
> therefore the whole 4D field of "s" positions must be saved. At this
> point, we might just as well specify the 4D field of z values directly,
> as there is no savings in the dimensionless vertical coordinate. But
> does CF allow the depth variable to be specified as a 4D field?
I agree that saving the 4D field of z values directly would be better. The
conventions allow this via the auxiliary coordinates attribute.
Brian
Received on Wed Dec 22 2004 - 09:18:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:40 BST