Dear Jonathan,
I think there certainly needs to be a mapping from the alias names in
metadata discovery tools, as people will come in from various fields with
variable terminology.
Cheers,
Ag
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Gregory [mailto:j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk]
> Sent: 10 February 2004 08:45
> To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: [CF-metadata] omega
>
>
> Dear Ag
>
> Yes, omega is already and will remain an alias. Because data
> lasts for ever,
> we will always have to retain previous standard names as
> aliases. The intention
> of aliases isn't to provide other ways of indexing the
> standard names, however.
> For that purpose, maybe we need to provide a search facility
> which would look
> at the descriptions as well as the standard names. Then, for
> instance, if the
> word "omega" appears in the description of
> lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure,
> it would find it for you when you search on "omega".
>
> In the earlier discussion, "omega" was decided to be too
> cryptic for those not
> familiar with atmospheric dynamics.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
Received on Tue Feb 10 2004 - 02:05:20 GMT
