I have been advising people to use the CF Conventions, but there is still a gap
in being able to specify projections. Id like to propose a way of defining
projections in addition/instead of section 5.6 at
http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cms/eaton/netcdf/CF-working.html#gmap
which uses the following example:
variables:
float T(lev, y, x) ;
T:long_name = "temperature" ;
T:units = "K" ;
T:coordinates = "lon lat" ;
T:grid_mapping="rotated_latitude_longitude grid_north_pole_latitude: \n"
" 32.5 grid_north_pole_longitude: 170." ;
1) i would prefer to use existing "authorities" such as FGDC to name the
projections. One way to do this would be to add standard attributes
"projectionAuthority" and "projectionName" and optional projection parameters
that depend on the projection, eg:
float T(lev, y, x) ;
T:projectionName = "Lambert_Conformal_Conic";
T:projectionAuthority="FGDC";
T:Standard_Parallel"="25.0";
T:Longitude_of_Central_Meridian"="-95.0";
T:Latitude_of_Projection_Origin"="25.0";
2) since its highly likely that many variables will share a projection, we
should have an option to factor them out, eg:
float T(lev, y, x) ;
T:projection = "myProjName";
char myProjName(p_len);
myProjName:projectionName = "Lambert_Conformal_Conic";
myProjName:projectionAuthority="FGDC";
myProjName:Standard_Parallel"="25.0";
myProjName:Longitude_of_Central_Meridian"="-95.0";
myProjName:Latitude_of_Projection_Origin"="25.0";
3) its important that the x and the y coordinates be identified, and that they
be understood to be coordinates on the specified projection plane. You could say
something like:
"Variables representing the x and y coordinates on the projection plane must
always explicitly include the units attribute; there is no default value. The
units attribute will be a string formatted as per the udunits.dat file. The
recommended unit of latitude is km. The variable representing the x and y
coordinates must have an attribute axisType="x" and "y" respectively."
4) obviously there are other ways to do it; this is the first thing that
occurred to me. the essentials are: 1) allow different naming sets, 2) allow
them to be factored out 3) unambigously identify the x and y coordinates.
5) there are other important "authorities", but FGDC would be a good start. the
FGDC projections and their parameters are found at
http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/documents/standards/metadata/v2_0698.pdf
i would be happy to compile these for your appendix if you'd like.
Received on Tue Nov 12 2002 - 14:28:56 GMT
