⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] Final 17 terms for CMIP6 LS3MIP: Heat flux into snowpack

From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC <martin.juckes>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:02:14 +0000

Dear Alison, Jonathan,


Thanks for these final suggestions. I agree with these proposals. I have a reservation about the interpretation of "sensible heat flux" which was mentioned in the discussion, but that does not need to delay approval of these proposed terms which neatly avoid the problem.


The usage of "sensible heat flux" outside the standard name list consistently refer to it as a thermodynamic property, not something which is specific to a particular medium. In the existing standard names which include the phrase "sensible_heat_flux" the descriptive text suggests that it applies to heat flux through air alone, implicitly excluding any heat flux conveyed by precipitation. It looks to me as though the wording is a reflection of the state of models at the time the standard names were defined, when it may have been reasonable to omit mention of transport of heat by precipitation and equate sensible heat flux at the surface to turbulent heat flux at the surface. As models can now, apparently, resolve the sensible heat flux associated with falling rain, I can't see any reason for maintaining an interpretation of "sensible_heat_flux" in standard names which conflicts with the normal usage.


regards,

Martin

________________________________
From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of Jonathan Gregory <jonathan.gregory at ncas.ac.uk>
Sent: 01 July 2018 18:27
To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Final 17 terms for CMIP6 LS3MIP: Heat flux into snowpack

Dear Alison and Martin

> tendency_of_thermal_energy_content_of_surface_snow_due_to_rainfall_temperature_excess_above_freezing

I think this suggestion of Alison's is very good, to describe the rainfall
temperature flux as a change in heat content due to X rather than as the
problematic X heat flux. Thanks.

> inward_water_volume_transport_along_river_channel
> outward_water_volume_transport_along_river_channel
> OR
> incoming_water_volume_transport_along_river_channel
> outgoing_water_volume_transport_along_river_channel.

I prefer the latter pair still, but I don't mind.

Best wishes

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
Received on Tue Jul 03 2018 - 05:02:14 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:43 BST

⇐ ⇒