Dear Jonathan,
the list I send is the currently operational list from the ARGOS
decision support system
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARGOS_DSS for
nuclear releases. It is operational at radiation protection agencies in
about 15 countries. It is the list of isotopes which are considered to
be relevant in past or hypothetical nuclear reactor accidents.
I could live with a list of 5-10 isotopes (cesium, iodine, strontium,
xenon,...) (i.e. ~30 standard-names) for now, and automatically create
names when needed, though they most likely won't appear in the list.
Thus, we would just describe the concept for standard_names for isotopes
rather than writing out all.
I removed already from the current ARGOS list the chemical-compounds of
iodine (methyl,I2,CsI) and plan to discuss them in another proposal.
Best regards,
Heiko
On 2018-01-19 15:57, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear all
>
> It's fine with me if we go ahead with this proposal as it stands. I don't
> think it's an overwhelming addition to the table, but since it is larger than
> I had supposed I thought I'd ask the question. Also, one further question: do
> you need *all* of these names *now*, Heiko? As you know, the usual principle is
> to request only those for which you have a definite use-case.
>
> Thanks for Roy and Heiko for explaining about metastable states.
>
> The initiative Roy mentioned is common concepts. The ticket (24) is still open
> and unfinished. It was almost agreed to define these bundles of metadata and
> given them opaque names. More recently, there was the standard string proposal
> (ticket 94). I preferred that one, myself; it would accomplish a similar aim
> without requiring new sorts of name. It also wasn't concluded, though. This
> paragraph is off the topic of Heiko's proposal, though.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Heiko Klein <Heiko.Klein at met.no> -----
>
>> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:35:17 +0100
>> From: Heiko Klein <Heiko.Klein at met.no>
>> To: "Lowry, Roy K." <rkl at bodc.ac.uk>, Jonathan Gregory
>> <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>, "cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu"
>> <cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>
>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and
>> radioactive particles
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>> Thunderbird/52.5.0
>>
>> Dear Jonathan,
>>
>> as Roy points out, the m denotes a metastable state. I try to describe
>> metastates in the description of the table as:
>>
>> 77mGe is the metastable state of the isotope germanium-77 with a
>> halflife of 6.27e-04 days
>>
>> I haven't proposed any metastable state of polonium, so 210mPo was a bad
>> example.
>>
>> I should mention that isotopes can even have several metastates, e.g.
>> americium:
>> 242m1Am is the metastable state of the isotope americium-242 with a
>> halflife of 5.53e+04 days
>> 242m2Am is the metastable state of the isotope americium-242 with a
>> halflife of 1.62e-07 days
>>
>>
>> The list is not complete, as standard-names never are. It is just the
>> list of the isotopes we regularly use.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2018-01-18 20:09, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:
>>> Dear Jonathan,
>>>
>>>
>>> My view is unchanged about embedding the isotope names in the Standard
>>> Name. A 30% increase in the Standard Name count is trivial compared to
>>> the 3000% increase that biological taxa could bring in, even for the
>>> limited subset of taxa falling in BODC's sphere of interest. We should
>>> maybe be thinking about the practicalities of?implementation?of Ticket
>>> 99 rather than wait for the first large-scale biological Standard?Names
>>> request, but without blocking Heiko's current work.??
>>>
>>>
>>> Have a look at?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_isomer?for what in
>>> my view is quite a nice description of meta-states (aka nuclear
>>> isomers), which is what is designated by the 'm'.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers, Roy.
>>>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_isomer>
>>>
>>> Nuclear isomer - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_isomer>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> A nuclear isomer is a metastable state of an atomic nucleus caused by
>>> the excitation of one or more of its nucleons (protons or neutrons).
>>> "Metastable" describes ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only
>>> working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on
>>> Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent
>>> to enquiries at bodc.ac.uk. Please also use this e-mail if your requirement
>>> is urgent.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* CF-metadata <cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of
>>> Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>
>>> *Sent:* 18 January 2018 17:24
>>> *To:* cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>> *Subject:* Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and
>>> radioactive particles
>>> ?
>>> Dear Heiko
>>>
>>> I agree with the construction of these standard names. I see that you are
>>> proposing ~1000 new standard names. The table currently contains ~3000, so
>>> this is not overwhelming, but it is a substantial increment, so I'm just
>>> asking again to confirm: Are we certain that we prefer to do it this way,
>>> with the isotopes in the standard names (like chemical species)?
>>>
>>> What does mPo mean, by the way (compared with just Po)?
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> ----- Forwarded message from Heiko Klein <Heiko.Klein at met.no> -----
>>>
>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:10:53 +0100
>>>> From: Heiko Klein <Heiko.Klein at met.no>
>>>> To: "Lowry, Roy K." <rkl at bodc.ac.uk>, Jonathan Gregory
>>>> ??????? <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>, "cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu"
>>>> ??????? <cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>
>>>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and
>>>> ??????? radioactive particles
>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>>>> ??????? Thunderbird/52.5.0
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I have the feeling that we all agree now on the usage of isotopes as
>>>> symbols. With this post I try to summarize the proposed standard-names:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ash:
>>>>
>>>> mass_concentration_of_volcanic_ash_in_air
>>>> canonical units: g/m^3
>>>> description: Mass concentration means mass per unit volume and is
>>>> used in the construction mass_concentration_of_X_in_Y, where X is a
>>>> material constituent of Y. "Volcanic_ash" means the fine-grained
>>>> products of explosive volcanic eruptions, such as minerals or
>>>> crystals, older fragmented rock (e.g. andesite), and glass. Particles
>>>> within a volcanic ash cloud have diameters less than 2 mm.
>>>> "Volcanic_ash" does not include non-volcanic dust.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Radioactivity (without naming the isotopes, general case):
>>>>
>>>> radioactivity_concentration_in_air
>>>> Bq/m3
>>>> Radioactivity concentration means activity per unit volume
>>>> where activity denotes the number of decays of the material per second.
>>>>
>>>> surface_radioactivity_content
>>>> Bq/m2
>>>> "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere. "Content"
>>>> indicates a quantity per unit area. Radioactivity of X means the number
>>>> of radioactive decays per second.
>>>>
>>>> integral_wrt_time_of_radioactivity_concentration_in_air
>>>> Bq*s/m3
>>>> The phrase "integral_wrt_X_of_Y" means int Y dX. The
>>>> data variable should have an axis for X specifying the limits of the
>>>> integral as bounds. "wrt" means with respect to.? Radioactivity
>>>> concentration means activity per unit volume where? activity denotes the
>>>> number of decays per second.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When naming the isotope, the names are:
>>>> radioactivity_concentration_of_X_in_air
>>>> surface_radioactivity_content_of_X
>>>> integral_wrt_time_of_radioactivity_concentration_of_X_in_air
>>>> with X denoting the isotope as 210mPo. A list of proposed standard-names
>>>> and descriptions (including full element-names) of these is attached.
>>>>
>>>> I hope this summary makes this proposal easier to implement in the
>>>> standard-name table.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Heiko
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2018-01-05 10:30, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:
>>>>> Dear Heiko,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That syntax works for me and makes the case for isotopes as symbols.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Roy.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only
>>>>> working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on
>>>>> Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent
>>>>> to enquiries at bodc.ac.uk. Please also use this e-mail if your requirement
>>>>> is urgent.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> *From:* Heiko Klein <Heiko.Klein at met.no>
>>>>> *Sent:* 05 January 2018 08:04
>>>>> *To:* Lowry, Roy K.; Jonathan Gregory; cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and
>>>>> radioactive particles
>>>>> ?
>>>>> Dear Jonathan and Roy,
>>>>>
>>>>> while this is not part of the current proposal, we should think of
>>>>> radionuclides in special chemical bindings. One of the most important
>>>>> one is that of iodine and there we could have:
>>>>>
>>>>> 133I_as_methyl_iodide
>>>>> 132I_as_methyl_iodide
>>>>>
>>>>> as well as
>>>>>
>>>>> 133I_as_hydrogen_iodide
>>>>> 132I_as_hydrogen_iodide
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> By using IUPAC symbols for isotopes and chemical names for chemical
>>>>> elements and compounds, we can have a nice and readable distinction
>>>>> between these two.
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically, I think we all agree that mixed case IUPAC symbols are the
>>>>> best candidate. I will start preparing a list with all proposed names.
>>>>>
>>>>> Heiko
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-01-04 17:31, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:
>>>>>> Dear Jonathan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My case for the hyphen is that to me it's a?more natural candidate as a
>>>>>> search target.? However, if we accept?mixed case IUPAC symbols for
>>>>>> isotopes then this becomes a non-issue. In my view it would be extremely
>>>>>> unwise to allow symbols?other than for isotopes as we already have
>>>>>> chemical names in the Standard Names.?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers, Roy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only
>>>>>> working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on
>>>>>> Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent
>>>>>> to enquiries at bodc.ac.uk. Please also use this e-mail if your requirement
>>>>>> is urgent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> *From:* CF-metadata <cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of
>>>>>> Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>
>>>>>> *Sent:* 04 January 2018 16:12
>>>>>> *To:* cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>>> *Subject:* [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and
>>>>>> radioactive particles
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> Dear Heiko and Roy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with both of you that 210Po would be best i.e. requiring
>>>>>> case-sensitive
>>>>>> symbols for elements. The reason that standard names are (at present)
>>>>>> all lower
>>>>>> case is that case-sensitivity would simply be an opportunity for people
>>>>>> to make
>>>>>> mistakes, while not making them any clearer. I would expect that all
>>>>>> scientists
>>>>>> are aware that the symbols for chemical elements are case-sensitive so
>>>>>> getting
>>>>>> them right will be OK, if we draw attention specifically to this exception.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unlike you, if mixed case isn't acceptable to others, I'd prefer
>>>>>> polonium210,
>>>>>> because I don't think including _ or - would make it easier to understand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another issue, though: we already have element *names* in many standard
>>>>>> names.
>>>>>> I presume we are not proposing to replace these with chemical element
>>>>>> symbols.
>>>>>> That is, we will not start writing Po for polonium in general. Is this new
>>>>>> orthography just for the case when you want to specify a particular isotope?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm glad that "radioactivity" is acceptable to experts. I hope it won't be
>>>>>> confusing. I do think that people from other disciplines will be alerted by
>>>>>> that word more effectively.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best wishes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Forwarded message from Heiko Klein <Heiko.Klein at met.no> -----
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:07:18 +0100
>>>>>>> From: Heiko Klein <Heiko.Klein at met.no>
>>>>>>> To: "Lowry, Roy K." <rkl at bodc.ac.uk>, Jonathan Gregory
>>>>>>> ??????? <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>, "cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu"
>>>>>>> ??????? <cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and
>>>>>>> ??????? radioactive particles
>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>>>>>>> ??????? Thunderbird/52.5.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear Roy,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree very much with the nomenclature used in the BODC dictionary.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would rule out a few of your options: When thinking of metastates,
>>>>>>> some cases don't work, f.e. 180mta and 180mtantalum.
>>>>>>> As you also mentioned, the number before the full-name (210-polonium) in
>>>>>>> never used, either number before abbreviation (210Po) or number after
>>>>>>> full-name (polonium-210). Thus the options are slightly less, but the
>>>>>>> preference remains the same:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 210Po (requires mixed case)
>>>>>>> polonium-210 (requires hyphens)
>>>>>>> polonium_210
>>>>>>> polonium210
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Heiko
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2018-01-04 10:35, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dear Heiko,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For reference, the presentation syntax we use in the BODC parameter
>>>>>>>> dictionary is of the form:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Activity of polonium-210 {210Po CAS 13981-52-7} per unit dry weight of
>>>>>>>> suspended particulate material by filtration and gamma spectroscopy
>>>>>>>> (high-purity Ge detector)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We use 'activity' as the technical term from the radio-chemistry
>>>>>>>> community for?decays per unit time, but I could live with
>>>>>>>> 'radioactivity', even though its semantics to specialists are much broader.?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We have a built-in synonym exposure and so are able to use two
>>>>>>>> representations of the isotope name. We went for polonium-210 rather
>>>>>>>> than 210-polonium due to common English language?usage (try Googling
>>>>>>>> 210-polonium: the top hits come back as polonium-210).?The syntax 210Po
>>>>>>>> is the only way to stay sane when writing formulae for compounds
>>>>>>>> containing multiple isotopes. As you say, the ability to use
>>>>>>>> superscripts would be very helpful, but that isn't going to happen in
>>>>>>>> Standard Names!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My vote for isotope labelling syntax depends upon what established
>>>>>>>> conventions (if any) the CF community are prepared to break - mixed case
>>>>>>>> or hyphens. The alternatives in my order or preference are:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 210Po (requires mixed case)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 210po
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> polonium-210 (requires hyphens)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 210-polonium? (requires hyphens)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> polonium_210
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 210_polonium
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> polonium210
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 210polonium
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So our preferences are the same.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers, Roy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only
>>>>>>>> working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on
>>>>>>>> Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent
>>>>>>>> to enquiries at bodc.ac.uk. Please also use this e-mail if your requirement
>>>>>>>> is urgent.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> *From:* CF-metadata <cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of
>>>>>>>> Heiko Klein <Heiko.Klein at met.no>
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 04 January 2018 08:49
>>>>>>>> *To:* Jonathan Gregory; cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and
>>>>>>>> radioactive particles
>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>> Dear Jonathan and Roy,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> after some internal discussions, we agree to the change of the name from
>>>>>>>> activity_* to radioactivity_* to make the name more universal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Concerning the names of the radionuclides, we will need to include the
>>>>>>>> mass-number, since there is no other distinction. I suggest using
>>>>>>>> mass-number and the IUPAC element abbreviation, e.g. 3H. Typically, the
>>>>>>>> 3 should be a superscript but that won't be possible here. Metastates
>>>>>>>> are then named like 180mTa. This requires upper-case letters.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If CF-standard_names don't like abbreviations, an alternative would be
>>>>>>>> to use the hyphen notation, i.e. hydrogen-3 and tantalum-180m (see
>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope) - but I have never seen
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> ?????
>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> ?????
>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ???????
>>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> ?????
>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> ?????
>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> ?????
>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ???????
>>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> ?????
>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ?????
>>>>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> ?????
>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> ?????
>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ???????
>>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> ?????
>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>>
>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>>>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific
>>>>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13
>>>>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> radionuclides been written out except on wikipedia, and the CF-guideline
>>>>>>>> document forbids dash '-' as far as I can see. So I prefer the abbreviation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Heiko
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2018-01-03 18:22, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Dear Heiko and Roy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am happy to agree with you that we should retain the radioactive species in
>>>>>>>>> the standard names, given (a) the number is not huge and as Roy said they would
>>>>>>>>> be added only as needed, (b) the distinction between these species and other
>>>>>>>>> chemical species is blurred, (c) there is no satisfactory external authority
>>>>>>>>> we could rely upon. We should be systematic about how we write the names of
>>>>>>>>> these species, as far as possible. For chemical species, we have not used
>>>>>>>>> numerals, and they are in lower case, as all standard names are (so far). I'm
>>>>>>>>> not sure those conventions can work for the names of nuclides though.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best wishes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----- Forwarded message from "Lowry, Roy K." <rkl at bodc.ac.uk> -----
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 13:52:01 +0000
>>>>>>>>>> From: "Lowry, Roy K." <rkl at bodc.ac.uk>
>>>>>>>>>> To: Heiko Klein <Heiko.Klein at met.no>, Jonathan Gregory
>>>>>>>>>> ?????? <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>, "cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu"
>>>>>>>>>> ?????? <cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>, SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER Barbara
>>>>>>>>>> ?????? <Barbara.SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER at zamg.ac.at>
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and
>>>>>>>>>> ?????? radioactive particles
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Heiko,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Check with Alison to see if you need to do anything to prevent the volcanic ash proposal becoming blocked.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There are more possible isotopes than I intuitively expected, but as CF philosophy is only to generate Standard Names on an 'as needed' basis the numbers should be manageable. Having the possibility of stable and radioactive compounds - say H2O (water) and 3H2O (tritiated water) - makes the clean separation of 'isotopes' and
>>>>>>>> 'chemicals' impossible and could get very messy with say 'water'
>>>>>>>> included in the Standard Name and 'tritiated water' normalised out into
>>>>>>>> an isotope controlled vocabulary.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Consequently, I share your preference for managing isotopes as chemicals in Standard names.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Roy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>> From: Heiko Klein [mailto:Heiko.Klein at met.no]
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 03 January 2018 13:13
>>>>>>>>>> To: Lowry, Roy K. <rkl at bodc.ac.uk>; Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>; cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu; SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER Barbara <Barbara.SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER at zamg.ac.at>
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and radioactive particles
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear Roy and Jonathan,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> should I split the volcanic ash and radioactive partcles proposal? It seems like ash is easily accepted, while radioactivity needs some discussions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I will here with our experts if radioactivity can replace activity, or if this is ambiguous in the nuclear community.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Concerning the isotopes, my current list has close to 400 elements. Most of them are pure radionuclides / isotopes, but some of them are radioactive meta-states (with different half-life), and others are chemical compounds of radioactive isotopes, which have very different transport properties and/or effects (e.g.
>>> iodine as
>>>>>>>> I2, ICH3, ICs)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The IAEA International Radiological Information Exchange (IRIX) format http://bip.paa.gov.pl/download/105/23784/Zalacznik6IRIXFormatv10ReferenceDescription.pdf
>>>>>>>>>> allows either nuclides directly or nuclide combinations, but even this expert format has problems covering most cases.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I prefer having everything in the standard_name, in particular if there is no external community actively doing own standardization. In addition, I don't even know what to call this external list, 'radioactive_material' maybe, to allow for both nuclides, metastates and compounds? I still hope to get them into the
>>>>>>>> standard_name liste.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Heiko
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2017-12-22 17:43, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Jonathan,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think the number of possible isotope names is relatively small (<100
>>>>>>>>>>> - please correct me if I'm wrong) compared to the thousand upon
>>>>>>>>>>> thousand of possible biological taxa. If so, I wonder if normalising
>>>>>>>>>>> out the isotope name is worth the effort of maintaining the standard
>>>>>>>>>>> list and complication to client software.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Roy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only
>>>>>>>>>>> working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on
>>>>>>>>>>> Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be
>>>>>>>>>>> sent to enquiries at bodc.ac.uk. Please also use this e-mail if your
>>>>>>>>>>> requirement is urgent.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* CF-metadata <cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of
>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 22 December 2017 15:17
>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash
>>>>>>>>>>> and radioactive particles
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Heiko and Barbara
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I see that "activity concentration" is an technical term, but in the
>>>>>>>>>>> broader context of the CF standard name table I feel it would be
>>>>>>>>>>> better to say radioactivity_concentration and radioactivity_content,
>>>>>>>>>>> to make it clear what sort of activity it's about.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As you say, we name chemical species in standard names, but there are
>>>>>>>>>>> not so many of these that have been requested. I think it's a choice
>>>>>>>>>>> to be made about whether isotopes should be named explicitly. In the
>>>>>>>>>>> analogous case of biological taxa,
>>>>>>>>>>> https://cf-trac.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/99 discussed not putting their
>>>>>>>>>>> identifiers in the standard name. That discussion wasn't concluded. A
>>>>>>>>>>> similar approach could be taken here, of putting "isotope" in the
>>>>>>>>>>> standard name, and requiring there to be a string-valued coordinate
>>>>>>>>>>> variable identifying the isotope from a standard list (like area types
>>>>>>>>>>> and regions).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Forwarded message from Heiko Klein <Heiko.Klein at met.no> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:41:42 +0100
>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Heiko Klein <Heiko.Klein at met.no>
>>>>>>>>>>>> To: SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER Barbara
>>>>>>>>>>>> <Barbara.SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER at zamg.ac.at>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??????? "cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??????? radioactive particles
>>>>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??????? Thunderbird/52.5.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Barbara and list,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with you that both volcanic ash and nuclear particles are
>>>>>>>>>>>> insufficiently reflected in the standard-name table and we need a
>>>>>>>>>>>> proposal for new names.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We have 'atmosphere_mass_content_of_volcanic_ash' which is the column
>>>>>>>>>>>> load and for concentrations, we have mass_concentration_of_*_in_air
>>>>>>>>>>>> so I would slightly modify your parameter and propose:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> mass_concentration_of_volcanic_ash_in_air
>>>>>>>>>>>> canonical units: g/m^3
>>>>>>>>>>>> description: Mass concentration means mass per unit volume and is
>>>>>>>>>>>> used in the construction mass_concentration_of_X_in_Y, where X is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> material constituent of Y. "Volcanic_ash" means the fine-grained
>>>>>>>>>>>> products of explosive volcanic eruptions, such as minerals or
>>>>>>>>>>>> crystals, older fragmented rock (e.g. andesite), and glass. Particles
>>>>>>>>>>>> within a volcanic ash cloud have diameters less than 2 mm.
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Volcanic_ash" does not include non-volcanic dust.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Concerning radioactivity, the situation is more difficult. I would
>>>>>>>>>>>> say we have 2 basic types: concentrations in air and depositions, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> the time-integral of the first. I would call depositions 'surface_content'
>>>>>>>>>>>> in CF, since content is defined as: a quantity per unit area. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> propose the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> activity_concentration_of_X_in_air (Bq/m3)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Description: Activity concentration means activity per unit volume
>>>>>>>>>>>> and is used in the construction activity_concentration_of_X_in_Y,
>>>>>>>>>>>> where X is a radioactive material and activity denotes the number of
>>>>>>>>>>>> decays of the material per second.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> surface_activity_content_of_X (Bq/m2)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Description: "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere.
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Content" indicates a quantity per unit area. activity of X means the
>>>>>>>>>>>> number of radioactive decays of the material X per second.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The first is often integrated over time for dose-calculations, i.e.
>>>>>>>>>>>> integral_wrt_time in CF-nomenclature:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> integral_wrt_time_of_activity_concentration_of_X_in_air (Bq*s/m3)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Description: The phrase "integral_wrt_X_of_Y" means int Y dX. The
>>>>>>>>>>>> data variable should have an axis for X specifying the limits of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> integral as bounds. "wrt" means with respect to.? Activity
>>>>>>>>>>>> concentration means activity per unit volume and is used in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> construction activity_concentration_of_X_in_Y, where X is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactive material and activity denotes the number of decays of the material per second.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The tricky part is the X here, which is a very long list of
>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactive isotopes. I attach the list which is in active use for
>>>>>>>>>>>> us, i.e. 383 nuclides including a few meta-states and chemical
>>>>>>>>>>>> speciations in particular for Iodine. Usual names for thes ar the
>>>>>>>>>>>> second and third column, i.e. H3, Na24, Ar41, Ge77m, Ge77 ... In CF,
>>>>>>>>>>>> it is most common to have these names in the standard-name (X in
>>>>>>>>>>>> above proposals) I'm not sure if it is practical possible to add
>>>>>>>>>>>> these 4*383 standard-names to the list? If it is just a question of formatting, I can try to do that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Heiko
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2017-12-18 14:36, SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER Barbara wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to ask some questions about appropriate standard names of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> variables:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm looking for the standard name of mean concentration of volcanic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ash at specific altitude levels.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I used
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass_concentration_of_ash_in_air
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but the CF convention checker realizes that this is an invalid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> standard_name.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, I did not find a valid standard name yet. Do you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have any recommendations?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, I'm looking for some standard names for variables
>>>>>>>>>>>>> related to radioactivity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I used
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deposited_activity_concentration (in Bq/m2).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time_integrated_activity_concentration_in_air (Bq s/m3).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The first variable contains information about the deposited
>>>>>>>>>>>>> activity concentration that depends on the type of the nuclide,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, latitude, and longitude.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The second variable contains information about the time-integrated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> activity concentration of different radionuclides at specific levels.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's dimensions are type of the nuclide, time, height, latitude,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and longitude.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any recommendation concerning the standard names of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> these variables?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Finally, I need to define a variable that contains the information
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about the radioactive nuclide itself. I defined a character
>>>>>>>>>>>>> variable that uses the (invalid) standard name:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactive_nuclides
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you also have advice for the standard name of this variable?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for your help!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? Barbara
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Barbara Scherllin-Pirscher
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fachabteilung Chemische Wettervorhersage/Section Chemical Weather
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Forecasts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bereich Daten, Methoden, Modelle/Division Data, Methods, Models
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZAMG - Zentralanstalt f?r Meteorologie und Geodynamik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A-1190 Wien, Hohe Warte 38
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tel.: +43 1 36026 2380
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fax: +43 1 36026 74
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> E-Mail: barbara.scherllin-pirscher at zamg.ac.at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:barbara.scherllin-pirscher at zamg.ac.at>__
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.zamg.ac.at <http://www.zamg.ac.at> <http://www.zamg.ac.at>
>>> <http://www.zamg.ac.at>
>>>>> <http://www.zamg.ac.at>
>>>>>> <http://www.zamg.ac.at>
>>>>>>>> <http://www.zamg.ac.at/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join us on facebook: www.facebook.com/zamg.at <http://www.facebook.com/zamg.at>
>>> <http://www.facebook.com/zamg.at>
>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/zamg.at>
>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/zamg.at>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/zamg.at>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Beschreibung: Beschreibung: Beschreibung: Beschreibung: Beschreibung:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cid:099c01ccebf6$aa43e440$7ba4168a at zadpc6 <http://www.zamg.at/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Heiko Klein?????????????????? Norwegian Meteorological Institute
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58???????????? P.O. Box 43 Blindern
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.met.no???????????????? 0313 Oslo NORWAY
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? 1 H -? 3? 0? 0.178E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? 2 Na- 24? 2? 0.128E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? 3 Ar- 41? 0? 0.105E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? 4 Co- 58? 2? 0.113E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? 5 Co- 60? 2? 0.416E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? 6 Zn- 72? 2? 0.414E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? 7 Ga- 72? 2? 0.137E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? 8 Ga- 73? 2? 0.395E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? 9 Ge- 75? 2? 0.140E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 10 Ge- 77m 2? 0.128E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 11 Ge- 77? 2? 0.170E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 12 Ge- 78? 2? 0.133E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 13 As- 77? 2? 0.496E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 14 As- 78? 2? 0.127E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 15 Se- 79? 2? 0.338E-12
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 16 Se- 81m 2? 0.202E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 17 Se- 81? 2? 0.625E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 18 Se- 83m 2? 0.990E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 19 Se- 83? 2? 0.513E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 20 Br- 82m 2? 0.189E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 21 Br- 82? 2? 0.544E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 22 Br- 83? 2? 0.802E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 23 Br- 84m 2? 0.193E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 24 Br- 84? 2? 0.363E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 25 Kr- 83m 0? 0.104E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 26 Kr- 85m 0? 0.438E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 27 Kr- 85? 0? 0.203E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 28 Kr- 87? 0? 0.152E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 29 Kr- 88? 0? 0.686E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 30 Kr- 89? 0? 0.364E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 31 Rb- 86m 2? 0.114E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 32 Rb- 86? 2? 0.430E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 33 Rb- 87? 2? 0.470E-18
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 34 Rb- 88? 2? 0.642E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 35 Rb- 89? 2? 0.760E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 36 Sr- 89? 2? 0.154E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 37 Sr- 90? 2? 0.787E-09
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 38 Sr- 91? 2? 0.203E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 39 Sr- 92? 2? 0.711E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 40 Y - 90m 2? 0.604E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 41 Y - 90? 2? 0.301E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 42 Y - 91m 2? 0.232E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 43 Y - 91? 2? 0.137E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 44 Y - 92? 2? 0.545E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 45 Y - 93? 2? 0.189E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 46 Y - 94? 2? 0.608E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 47 Y - 95? 2? 0.110E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 48 Zr- 93? 2? 0.231E-13
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 49 Zr- 95? 2? 0.123E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 50 Zr- 97? 2? 0.115E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 51 Nb- 94m 2? 0.185E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 52 Nb- 94? 2? 0.110E-11
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 53 Nb- 95m 2? 0.222E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 54 Nb- 95? 2? 0.228E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 55 Nb- 96? 2? 0.823E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 56 Nb- 97m 2? 0.128E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 57 Nb- 97? 2? 0.157E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 58 Nb- 98? 2? 0.227E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 59 Mo- 99? 2? 0.289E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 60 Mo-101? 2? 0.791E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 61 Mo-102? 2? 0.104E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 62 Tc- 99m 2? 0.320E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 63 Tc- 99? 2? 0.103E-12
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 64 Tc-101? 2? 0.814E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 65 Tc-102m 2? 0.269E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 66 Tc-102? 2? 0.131E+00
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 67 Tc-104? 2? 0.642E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 68 Ru-103? 2? 0.203E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 69 Ru-105? 2? 0.434E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 70 Ru-106? 2? 0.219E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 71 Rh-103m 2? 0.206E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 72 Rh-105m 2? 0.182E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 73 Rh-105? 2? 0.542E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 74 Rh-106m 2? 0.883E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 75 Rh-106? 2? 0.232E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 76 Rh-107? 2? 0.532E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 77 Pd-107m 2? 0.325E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 78 Pd-107? 2? 0.338E-14
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 79 Pd-109? 2? 0.143E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 80 Pd-111m 2? 0.350E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 81 Pd-111? 2? 0.525E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 82 Pd-112? 2? 0.958E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 83 Ag-109m 2? 0.175E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 84 Ag-110m 2? 0.297E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 85 Ag-111m 2? 0.937E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 86 Ag-111? 2? 0.107E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 87 Ag-112? 2? 0.615E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 88 Ag-113m 2? 0.105E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 89 Ag-113? 2? 0.363E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 90 Ag-115m 2? 0.408E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 91 Ag-115? 2? 0.550E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 92 Cd-111m 2? 0.237E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 93 Cd-113m 2? 0.151E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 94 Cd-113? 2? 0.244E-23
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 95 Cd-115m 2? 0.180E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 96 Cd-115? 2? 0.360E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 97 Cd-117m 2? 0.566E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 98 Cd-117? 2? 0.741E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? 99 Cd-118? 2? 0.230E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 100 In-113m 2? 0.116E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 101 In-115m 2? 0.428E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 102 In-115? 2? 0.431E-23
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 103 In-116m 2? 0.213E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 104 In-116? 2? 0.488E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 105 In-117m 2? 0.993E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 106 In-117? 2? 0.263E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 107 In-118m 2? 0.263E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 108 In-118? 2? 0.139E+00
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 109 In-119m 2? 0.642E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 110 In-119? 2? 0.462E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 111 Sn-117m 2? 0.573E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 112 Sn-119m 2? 0.328E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 113 Sn-121m 2? 0.440E-09
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 114 Sn-121? 2? 0.718E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 115 Sn-123m 2? 0.289E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 116 Sn-123? 2? 0.622E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 117 Sn-125? 2? 0.831E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 118 Sn-126? 2? 0.220E-12
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 119 Sn-127? 2? 0.908E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 120 Sn-128? 2? 0.196E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 121 Sn-130? 2? 0.312E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 122 Sb-124m 2? 0.569E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 123 Sb-124? 2? 0.133E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 124 Sb-125? 2? 0.805E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 125 Sb-126m 2? 0.608E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 126 Sb-126? 2? 0.647E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 127 Sb-127? 2? 0.211E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 128 Sb-128m 2? 0.111E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 129 Sb-128? 2? 0.214E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 130 Sb-129? 2? 0.444E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 131 Sb-130m 2? 0.175E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 132 Sb-130? 2? 0.312E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 133 Sb-131? 2? 0.502E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 134 Te-125m 2? 0.138E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 135 Te-127m 2? 0.736E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 136 Te-127? 2? 0.205E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 137 Te-129m 2? 0.240E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 138 Te-129? 2? 0.165E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 139 Te-131m 2? 0.642E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 140 Te-131? 2? 0.462E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 141 Te-132? 2? 0.247E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 142 Te-133m 2? 0.209E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 143 Te-133? 2? 0.924E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 144 Te-134? 2? 0.275E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 145 I -129? 1? 0.138E-14
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 146 I -130m 1? 0.130E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 147 I -130? 1? 0.155E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 148 I -131? 1? 0.994E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 149 I -132? 1? 0.836E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 150 I -133m 1? 0.770E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 151 I -133? 1? 0.921E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 152 I -134m 1? 0.321E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 153 I -134? 1? 0.222E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 154 I -135? 1? 0.288E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 155 Xe-129m 0? 0.100E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 156 Xe-131m 0? 0.680E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 157 Xe-133m 0? 0.355E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 158 Xe-133? 0? 0.152E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 159 Xe-134m 0? 0.239E+01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 160 Xe-135m 0? 0.743E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 161 Xe-135? 0? 0.210E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 162 Xe-137? 0? 0.296E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 163 Xe-138? 0? 0.815E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 164 Cs-134m 2? 0.664E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 165 Cs-134? 2? 0.107E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 166 Cs-135m 2? 0.218E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 167 Cs-135? 2? 0.956E-14
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 168 Cs-136? 2? 0.617E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 169 Cs-137? 2? 0.729E-09
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 170 Cs-138? 2? 0.359E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 171 Ba-135m 2? 0.671E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 172 Ba-137m 2? 0.453E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 173 Ba-139? 2? 0.139E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 174 Ba-140? 2? 0.627E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 175 La-140? 2? 0.456E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 176 La-141? 2? 0.498E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 177 La-142? 2? 0.125E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 178 La-143? 2? 0.825E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 179 Ce-141? 2? 0.243E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 180 Ce-142? 2? 0.440E-24
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 181 Ce-143? 2? 0.584E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 182 Ce-144? 2? 0.282E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 183 Ce-146? 2? 0.814E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 184 Pr-142m 2? 0.791E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 185 Pr-142? 2? 0.101E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 186 Pr-143? 2? 0.591E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 187 Pr-144m 2? 0.161E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 188 Pr-144? 2? 0.669E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 189 Pr-145? 2? 0.322E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 190 Pr-146? 2? 0.477E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 191 Pr-147? 2? 0.963E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 192 Nd-144? 2? 0.105E-22
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 193 Nd-147? 2? 0.730E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 194 Nd-149? 2? 0.111E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 195 Nd-151? 2? 0.932E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 196 Nd-152? 2? 0.101E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 197 Pm-147? 2? 0.838E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 198 Pm-148m 2? 0.194E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 199 Pm-148? 2? 0.149E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 200 Pm-149? 2? 0.363E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 201 Pm-150? 2? 0.718E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 202 Pm-151? 2? 0.678E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 203 Pm-152m 2? 0.642E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 204 Pm-152? 2? 0.282E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 205 Sm-147? 2? 0.205E-18
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 206 Sm-148? 2? 0.275E-23
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 207 Sm-149? 2? 0.220E-23
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 208 Sm-151? 2? 0.236E-09
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 209 Sm-153? 2? 0.414E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 210 Sm-155? 2? 0.520E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 211 Sm-156? 2? 0.205E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 212 Eu-154? 2? 0.256E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 213 Eu-155? 2? 0.458E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 214 Eu-156? 2? 0.528E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 215 Eu-157? 2? 0.127E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 216 Eu-158? 2? 0.252E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 217 Eu-159? 2? 0.638E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 218 Gd-159? 2? 0.104E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 219 Gd-162? 2? 0.116E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 220 Tb-160? 2? 0.111E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 221 Tb-161? 2? 0.116E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 222 Tb-162m 2? 0.863E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 223 Tb-162? 2? 0.155E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 224 Tb-163? 2? 0.592E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 225 Dy-165? 2? 0.819E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 226 Hg-206? 2? 0.144E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 227 Tl-206? 2? 0.276E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 228 Tl-207? 2? 0.241E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 229 Tl-208? 2? 0.373E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 230 Tl-209? 2? 0.525E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 231 Tl-210? 2? 0.889E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 232 Pb-207m 2? 0.866E+00
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 233 Pb-209? 2? 0.583E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 234 Pb-210? 2? 0.105E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 235 Pb-211? 2? 0.320E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 236 Pb-212? 2? 0.181E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 237 Pb-213? 2? 0.116E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 238 Pb-214? 2? 0.431E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 239 Bi-209? 2? 0.110E-25
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 240 Bi-210? 2? 0.160E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 241 Bi-211? 2? 0.537E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 242 Bi-212? 2? 0.191E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 243 Bi-213? 2? 0.246E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 244 Bi-214? 2? 0.586E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 245 Bi-215? 2? 0.165E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 246 Po-210? 2? 0.580E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 247 Po-211? 2? 0.133E+01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 248 Po-212? 2? 0.228E+07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 249 Po-213? 2? 0.165E+06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 250 Po-214? 2? 0.423E+04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 251 Po-215? 2? 0.389E+03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 252 Po-216? 2? 0.462E+01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 253 Po-217? 2? 0.693E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 254 Po-218? 2? 0.379E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 255 At-215? 2? 0.693E+04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 256 At-216? 2? 0.231E+04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 257 At-217? 2? 0.217E+02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 258 At-218? 2? 0.347E+00
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 259 At-219? 2? 0.128E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 260 Rn-218? 2? 0.198E+02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 261 Rn-219? 2? 0.173E+00
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 262 Rn-220? 2? 0.126E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 263 Rn-221? 2? 0.462E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 264 Rn-222? 2? 0.210E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 265 Rn-223? 2? 0.269E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 266 Fr-221? 2? 0.241E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 267 Fr-222? 2? 0.781E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 268 Fr-223? 2? 0.525E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 269 Ra-222? 2? 0.182E-01
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 270 Ra-223? 0? 0.702E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 271 Ra-224? 0? 0.220E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 272 Ra-225? 0? 0.542E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 273 Ra-226? 0? 0.137E-10
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 274 Ra-227? 0? 0.280E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 275 Ra-228? 0? 0.328E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 276 Ra-229? 0? 0.693E+12
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 277 Ac-225? 2? 0.802E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 278 Ac-226? 2? 0.664E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 279 Ac-227? 2? 0.102E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 280 Ac-228? 2? 0.314E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 281 Ac-229? 2? 0.175E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 282 Th-226? 2? 0.374E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 283 Th-227? 2? 0.441E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 284 Th-228? 2? 0.115E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 285 Th-229? 2? 0.299E-11
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 286 Th-230? 2? 0.275E-12
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 287 Th-231? 2? 0.755E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 288 Th-232? 2? 0.156E-17
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 289 Th-233? 2? 0.520E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 290 Th-234? 2? 0.333E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 291 Pa-230? 2? 0.453E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 292 Pa-231? 2? 0.676E-12
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 293 Pa-232? 2? 0.612E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 294 Pa-233? 2? 0.297E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 295 Pa-234m 2? 0.987E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 296 Pa-234? 2? 0.285E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 297 U -230? 2? 0.386E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 298 U -231? 2? 0.187E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 299 U -232? 2? 0.305E-09
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 300 U -233? 2? 0.136E-12
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 301 U -234? 2? 0.889E-13
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 302 U -235? 2? 0.309E-16
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 303 U -236? 2? 0.919E-15
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 304 U -237? 2? 0.119E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 305 U -238? 2? 0.487E-17
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 306 U -239? 2? 0.492E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 307 U -240? 2? 0.134E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 308 Np-235? 2? 0.196E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 309 Np-236m 2? 0.170E-15
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 310 Np-236? 2? 0.875E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 311 Np-237? 2? 0.103E-13
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 312 Np-238? 2? 0.382E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 313 Np-239? 2? 0.341E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 314 Np-240m 2? 0.158E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 315 Np-240? 2? 0.183E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 316 Pu-235? 2? 0.444E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 317 Pu-236? 2? 0.771E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 318 Pu-237? 2? 0.176E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 319 Pu-238? 2? 0.255E-09
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 320 Pu-239? 2? 0.900E-12
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 321 Pu-240? 2? 0.334E-11
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 322 Pu-241? 2? 0.166E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 323 Pu-242? 2? 0.580E-13
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 324 Pu-243? 2? 0.387E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 325 Pu-244? 2? 0.275E-15
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 326 Pu-245? 2? 0.193E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 327 Am-240? 2? 0.378E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 328 Am-241? 2? 0.480E-10
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 329 Am-242* 2? 0.495E+02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 330 Am-242m 2? 0.145E-09
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 331 Am-242? 2? 0.120E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 332 Am-243? 2? 0.276E-11
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 333 Am-244m 2? 0.444E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 334 Am-244? 2? 0.191E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 335 Am-245? 2? 0.917E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 336 Cm-241? 2? 0.229E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 337 Cm-242? 2? 0.492E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 338 Cm-243? 2? 0.686E-09
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 339 Cm-244? 2? 0.125E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 340 Cm-245? 2? 0.236E-11
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 341 Cm-246? 2? 0.399E-11
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 342 Cm-247? 2? 0.137E-14
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 343 Cm-248? 2? 0.467E-13
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 344 Cm-249? 2? 0.181E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 345 Cm-250? 2? 0.318E-11
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 346 Bk-249? 2? 0.255E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 347 Bk-250? 2? 0.598E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 348 Cf-249? 2? 0.610E-10
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 349 Cf-250? 2? 0.169E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 350 Cf-251? 2? 0.275E-10
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 351 Cf-252? 2? 0.829E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 352 Cf-253? 2? 0.456E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 353 Cf-254? 2? 0.133E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 354 Es-253? 2? 0.392E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 355 Es-254m 2? 0.491E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 356 Es-254? 2? 0.291E-07
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 357 Es-255? 2? 0.209E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 358 C - 11? 0? 0.567E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 359 N - 13? 0? 0.116E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 360 O - 15? 0? 0.567E-02
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 361 F - 18? 0? 0.115E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 380 Mn- 54? 2? 2.571E-08
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 545 I -129e 1? 0.138E-14
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 645 I -129o 1? 0.138E-14
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 745 I -129a 1? 0.138E-14
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 547 I -130e 1? 0.155E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 647 I -130o 1? 0.155E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 747 I -130a 1? 0.155E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 548 I -131e 1? 0.994E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 648 I -131o 1? 0.994E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 748 I -131a 1? 0.994E-06
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 549 I -132e 1? 0.836E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 649 I -132o 1? 0.836E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 749 I -132a 1? 0.836E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 551 I -133e 1? 0.921E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 651 I -133o 1? 0.921E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 751 I -133a 1? 0.921E-05
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 553 I -134e 1? 0.222E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 653 I -134o 1? 0.222E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 753 I -134a 1? 0.222E-03
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 554 I -135e 1? 0.288E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 654 I -135o 1? 0.288E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>> ? 754 I -135a 1? 0.288E-04
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>>>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> -- This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
>>>>>>>>>>> is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of
>>>>>>>>>>> this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it
>>>>>>>>>>> is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC
>>>>>>>>>>> may be stored in an electronic records management system.
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>>>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Heiko Klein?????????????????? Norwegian Meteorological Institute
>>>>>>>>>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58???????????? P.O. Box 43 Blindern
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.met.no???????????????? 0313 Oslo NORWAY
>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> ? This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records
>>> management system.
>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list
>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dr. Heiko Klein?????????????????? Norwegian Meteorological Institute
>>>>>>>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58???????????? P.O. Box 43 Blindern
>>>>>>>> http://www.met.no???????????????? 0313 Oslo NORWAY
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list
>>>>>>>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is
>>>>>>>> subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this
>>>>>>>> email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is
>>>>>>>> exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be
>>>>>>>> stored in an electronic records management system.
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dr. Heiko Klein?????????????????? Norwegian Meteorological Institute
>>>>>>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58???????????? P.O. Box 43 Blindern
>>>>>>> http://www.met.no???????????????? 0313 Oslo NORWAY
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list
>>>>>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is
>>>>>> subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this
>>>>>> email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is
>>>>>> exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be
>>>>>> stored in an electronic records management system.
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list
>>>>>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dr. Heiko Klein?????????????????? Norwegian Meteorological Institute
>>>>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58???????????? P.O. Box 43 Blindern
>>>>> http://www.met.no???????????????? 0313 Oslo NORWAY
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is
>>>>> subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this
>>>>> email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is
>>>>> exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be
>>>>> stored in an electronic records management system.
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dr. Heiko Klein?????????????????? Norwegian Meteorological Institute
>>>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58???????????? P.O. Box 43 Blindern
>>>> http://www.met.no???????????????? 0313 Oslo NORWAY
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CF-metadata mailing list
>>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is
>>> subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this
>>> email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is
>>> exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be
>>> stored in an electronic records management system.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CF-metadata mailing list
>>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Heiko Klein Norwegian Meteorological Institute
>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58 P.O. Box 43 Blindern
>> http://www.met.no 0313 Oslo NORWAY
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
--
Dr. Heiko Klein Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58 P.O. Box 43 Blindern
http://www.met.no 0313 Oslo NORWAY
Received on Mon Jan 22 2018 - 01:19:45 GMT
